aiqbench analysis
This study analyzes the internal mechanisms of Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct regarding cognitive and affective empathy, revealing specific attention patterns and representation drifts during emotion-based response generation. The findings demonstrate that models can leverage existing affective structures to produce empathetic responses without external prompting, offering a new framework for monitoring emotional processing in large language models.
From Encoding to Generation: Towards Empathetic Large Language Models
arXiv:2610.27603v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Empathetic interaction involves two distinguishable capacities: representing another person's emotional state (cognitive empathy) and generating an appropriate response to that state (affective empathy). We apply this distinction to examine how emotion-related information is internally organized, selectively attended to, and carried through response generation in Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct across 10 emotion categories from the EmpatheticDialogues dataset. Layer-wise linear probing revealed a broad middle-layer region of peak emotion-category decodability, with the layer-11 L2 probe achieving 63.6% held-out accuracy against a 10% chance level and a 54.6% TF-IDF lexical baseline. During response generation, emotion-related user tokens received 1.89 times as much attention per token as other utterance tokens, concentrated across layers 10-15. Target-emotion alignment then decreased from a mean cosine similarity of 0.239 for input representations to 0.125 for generated responses, with positive drift in 77% of examples and the largest shifts for angry and furious. Emotion-category representation, attention allocation, and response-level alignment therefore emerge as distinguishable components of model processing that can be analyzed through a functional cognitive-affective empathy framework. These findings provide a foundation for monitoring emotion representations during generation and leveraging models' existing affective structure to support more naturally empathetic responses without relying on external prompting or explicit emotion conditioning.
Abstract:Empathetic interaction involves two distinguishable capacities: representing another person's emotional state (cognitive empathy) and generating an appropriate response to that state (affective empathy). We apply this distinction to examine how emotion-related information is internally organized, selectively attended to, and carried through response generation in Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct across 10 emotion categories from the EmpatheticDialogues dataset. Layer-wise linear probing revealed a broad middle-layer region of peak emotion-category decodability, with the layer-11 L2 probe achieving 63.6% held-out accuracy against a 10% chance level and a 54.6% TF-IDF lexical baseline. During response generation, emotion-related user tokens received 1.89 times as much attention per token as other utterance tokens, concentrated across layers 10-15. Target-emotion alignment then decreased from a mean cosine similarity of 0.239 for input representations to 0.125 for generated responses, with positive drift in 77% of examples and the largest shifts for angry and furious. Emotion-category representation, attention allocation, and response-level alignment therefore emerge as distinguishable components of model processing that can be analyzed through a functional cognitive-affective empathy framework. These findings provide a foundation for monitoring emotion representations during generation and leveraging models' existing affective structure to support more naturally empathetic responses without relying on external prompting or explicit emotion conditioning.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.27603 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.27603v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.27603 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 292 words
Related coverage
Dynamic Commonsense Coordination for Empathetic Response Generation
arXiv · Jul 27, 2026
ER-EDF: A Psychology-Grounded Emotion Regulation Framework for Speech Empathetic Dialogue Generation in Large Audio-Language Models
arXiv · Sep 16, 2026
Guiding Language Models to Be More Empathetic: Culturally Sensitive Mental Health Advice Generation Through Human-LLM Collaboration
arXiv · Jul 28, 2026
EmpaAva: An Open-source Agentic 3D-Avatar Empathetic Live Chatbot
arXiv · Aug 6, 2026