aiqbench analysis
This paper extends the Feasible Action-Space Reduction (FeAR) metric from discrete grid-worlds to continuous spatial interactions, addressing a critical gap for safely deploying autonomous agents in real-world environments. By quantifying causal responsibility in space-continuous scenarios, the work provides a rigorous framework for analyzing both backward-looking liability and forward-looking decision-making in shared spaces. This advancement is essential for engineering robust multi-agent systems that can operate reliably alongside humans in complex, dynamic settings.
Feasible Action Space Reduction for Quantifying Causal Responsibility in Continuous Spatial Interactions
arXiv:2505.17739v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Understanding the causal influence of one agent on another agent is crucial for safely deploying artificially intelligent systems such as automated vehicles and mobile robots into human-inhabited environments. Existing models of causal responsibility deal with simplified abstractions of scenarios with discrete actions, thus, limiting real-world use when understanding responsibility in spatial interactions. Based on the assumption that spatially interacting agents are embedded in a scene and must follow an action at each instant, Feasible Action-Space Reduction (FeAR) was proposed as a metric for causal responsibility in a grid-world setting with discrete actions.Since real-world interactions involve continuous action spaces, this paper proposes a formulation of the FeAR metric for measuring causal responsibility in space-continuous interactions. We illustrate the utility of the metric in prototypical space-sharing conflicts, and showcase its applications for analysing backward-looking responsibility and in estimating forward-looking responsibility to guide agent decision making. Our results highlight the potential of the FeAR metric for designing and engineering artificial agents, as well as for assessing the responsibility of agents around humans.
Abstract:Understanding the causal influence of one agent on another agent is crucial for safely deploying artificially intelligent systems such as automated vehicles and mobile robots into human-inhabited environments. Existing models of causal responsibility deal with simplified abstractions of scenarios with discrete actions, thus, limiting real-world use when understanding responsibility in spatial interactions. Based on the assumption that spatially interacting agents are embedded in a scene and must follow an action at each instant, Feasible Action-Space Reduction (FeAR) was proposed as a metric for causal responsibility in a grid-world setting with discrete this http URL real-world interactions involve continuous action spaces, this paper proposes a formulation of the FeAR metric for measuring causal responsibility in space-continuous interactions. We illustrate the utility of the metric in prototypical space-sharing conflicts, and showcase its applications for analysing backward-looking responsibility and in estimating forward-looking responsibility to guide agent decision making. Our results highlight the potential of the FeAR metric for designing and engineering artificial agents, as well as for assessing the responsibility of agents around humans.
Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2505.17739 [cs.MA]
(or arXiv:2505.17739v2 [cs.MA] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.17739 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 272 words
Related coverage
A Reference Architecture for Integrating Agentic AI into Enterprise Software: Responsibilities, Interactions, and Variability
arXiv · Oct 15, 2026
PolyAlign: Conditional Human-Distribution Alignment
arXiv · Aug 7, 2026
PolyAlign: Conditional Human-Distribution Alignment
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026

Researchers Bound How Much Transition Rates Can Be Modulated
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 25, 2026