aiqbench analysis
This research introduces R-POD, a novel off-policy learning framework for recommender systems that decomposes ranking policies into top-$k$ selection and bottom-filling stages. By applying importance weighting only to the critical top-$k$ actions, the method significantly reduces variance while mitigating the bias inherent in pure regression approaches. This advancement addresses a core challenge in training large-scale ranking models using historical logged data without requiring active exploration.
Efficient Offline Learning of Ranking Policies via Top-$k$ Policy Decomposition
arXiv:2609.36740v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many recommender systems such as for e-commerce and news platforms aim to provide users with rankings they are likely to interact with. Off-Policy Learning (OPL) of ranking policies enables us to learn new ranking policies using only historical logged data. However, ranking settings make OPL remarkably challenging because their action spaces consist of permutations of unique items, being extremely large. Existing methods primarily use either policy- or regression-based approaches. The policy-based approach, which typically uses importance-weighted policy gradients, can suffer from high variance due to large action spaces. The regression-based approach, on the other hand, estimates the expected reward using conventional machine learning methods, avoiding variance issues but potentially suffering from severe bias. To circumvent these issues of existing methods, we propose a new OPL method for ranking, named Ranking Policy Optimization via Top-$k$ Policy Decomposition (R-POD), which combines the policy- and regression-based approaches in an effective fashion. Specifically, R-POD decomposes a ranking policy into a first-stage policy for selecting top-$k$ actions and a second-stage policy for choosing the bottom actions given the top-$k$ actions. It learns the first-stage policy using a new policy gradient estimator and the second-stage policy via the regression-based approach. This method can substantially reduce variance, since it applies importance weighting only to the top-$k$ actions. We also demonstrate that our policy-gradient estimator for the first-stage policy is unbiased under a conditional pairwise correctness condition, which only requires that the expected reward differences of pairs of rankings sharing the same top-$k$ actions can be estimated correctly.
Abstract:Many recommender systems such as for e-commerce and news platforms aim to provide users with rankings they are likely to interact with. Off-Policy Learning (OPL) of ranking policies enables us to learn new ranking policies using only historical logged data. However, ranking settings make OPL remarkably challenging because their action spaces consist of permutations of unique items, being extremely large. Existing methods primarily use either policy- or regression-based approaches. The policy-based approach, which typically uses importance-weighted policy gradients, can suffer from high variance due to large action spaces. The regression-based approach, on the other hand, estimates the expected reward using conventional machine learning methods, avoiding variance issues but potentially suffering from severe bias. To circumvent these issues of existing methods, we propose a new OPL method for ranking, named Ranking Policy Optimization via Top-$k$ Policy Decomposition (R-POD), which combines the policy- and regression-based approaches in an effective fashion. Specifically, R-POD decomposes a ranking policy into a first-stage policy for selecting top-$k$ actions and a second-stage policy for choosing the bottom actions given the top-$k$ actions. It learns the first-stage policy using a new policy gradient estimator and the second-stage policy via the regression-based approach. This method can substantially reduce variance, since it applies importance weighting only to the top-$k$ actions. We also demonstrate that our policy-gradient estimator for the first-stage policy is unbiased under a conditional pairwise correctness condition, which only requires that the expected reward differences of pairs of rankings sharing the same top-$k$ actions can be estimated correctly.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.36740 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.36740v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36740 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 344 words
Related coverage

Bypassing inference bottlenecks: Accelerating complex AI search with Retrieve-for-Train
Google Research · Sep 15, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026
On-Policy Distillation Meets Off-Policy GRPO: Training Compact Instruction-Following Rerankers
arXiv · Sep 3, 2026
OLIVE: Online Low-Rank Incremental Learning for Efficient Adaptive Exoskeletons
arXiv · Jul 24, 2026