aiqbench analysis
This research proposes a scalable dissipative strategy using thermal baths to stabilize gapped many-body phases, such as topologically ordered states, against Floquet heating in driven quantum systems. By coupling the system to an engineered bath, the method guides it into a non-equilibrium steady state with high ground-state occupation, verified via the Floquet-Born-Markov master equation. The approach specifically targets challenges in strongly driven Bose-Hubbard systems, offering a pathway to prepare complex states like fractional Chern insulators without relying solely on slow adiabatic protocols.
Dissipative Floquet engineering of gapped many-body phases using thermal baths
arXiv:2604.01291v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Floquet engineering, the control of a quantum system by means of time-periodic driving, allows to modify the properties of a system so that it is described by an approximate effective time-independent Hamiltonian. However, in the presence of interactions the stabilization of interesting many-body ground states of such effective Hamiltonians is possible only on a certain time scale, beyond which Floquet heating sets in, as it results from unwanted driving induced resonant excitation. Moreover, the preparation of the ground state of such Floquet engineered effective Hamiltonians usually has to be accomplished adiabatically, which is another source of heating, especially when a phase transition has to be passed in a large system. Here, we propose a general dissipative strategy for the preparation and stabilization of effective ground states that are protected by an energy gap, such as topologically ordered states. It is scalable and relies on coupling the driven system to a thermal bath, the properties of which are chosen so that it both suppresses Floquet heating and guides the system into a non-equilibrium steady state with a large occupation of the effective ground-state. The small residual occupations of effective excited states are non-thermal, reflecting the non-equilibrium nature of the scheme. We use the Floquet-Born-Markov master equation to verify the proposed strategy. In particular, we discuss the preparation of both a one-dimensional Mott insulator and a two-dimensional fractional Chern insulator in strongly driven Bose-Hubbard systems.
Abstract:Floquet engineering, the control of a quantum system by means of time-periodic driving, allows to modify the properties of a system so that it is described by an approximate effective time-independent Hamiltonian. However, in the presence of interactions the stabilization of interesting many-body ground states of such effective Hamiltonians is possible only on a certain time scale, beyond which Floquet heating sets in, as it results from unwanted driving induced resonant excitation. Moreover, the preparation of the ground state of such Floquet engineered effective Hamiltonians usually has to be accomplished adiabatically, which is another source of heating, especially when a phase transition has to be passed in a large system. Here, we propose a general dissipative strategy for the preparation and stabilization of effective ground states that are protected by an energy gap, such as topologically ordered states. It is scalable and relies on coupling the driven system to a thermal bath, the properties of which are chosen so that it both suppresses Floquet heating and guides the system into a non-equilibrium steady state with a large occupation of the effective ground-state. The small residual occupations of effective excited states are non-thermal, reflecting the non-equilibrium nature of the scheme. We use the Floquet-Born-Markov master equation to verify the proposed strategy. In particular, we discuss the preparation of both a one-dimensional Mott insulator and a two-dimensional fractional Chern insulator in strongly driven Bose-Hubbard systems.
Quantum Gases (cond-mat.quant-gas); Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
arXiv:2604.01291 [cond-mat.quant-gas]
(or arXiv:2604.01291v2 [cond-mat.quant-gas] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.01291 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 331 words
Related coverage

Researchers Find Heat Unlocks New Topology in Cold Atoms
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 10, 2026

A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
Quantum Journal · Sep 1, 2026

Is The Brain A Quantum Computer? The Decoherence Numbers Say No
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 13, 2026

Quantum Systems Can Still Generate Power Despite Energy Loss
Quantum Zeitgeist · May 22, 2026