Skip to content
Off-topic for aiqbench

Off-topic for aiqbench

This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.

DisCo Algebra: Why Disintegration and Combination Are Not Inverses

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.15006v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present DisCo algebra---a compositional framework for joint probability built from a symmetric cooperad (disintegration) and a symmetric operad (combination) on the bare family $\mathcal{P}_n=\mathrm{Prob}([0,1]^n)$. No probability integral transform, no external summary functions, no enrichment of objects with conditional kernels. The disintegration side uses block-wise joint CDFs as intrinsic, measure-determined 1D summaries, yielding a lossy compression. The combination side reads the same summaries and reconstructs via regular conditional measures, yielding a lossless embedding. We prove that combination followed by disintegration is the identity on admissible inputs, but disintegration followed by combination is not---the information loss is exactly the conditional KL divergence between the true conditional distribution and the conditionally independent product. This asymmetry reveals a hard limit on how much cross-block dependence can be captured by scalar block summaries.

Abstract:We present DisCo algebra---a compositional framework for joint probability built from a symmetric cooperad (disintegration) and a symmetric operad (combination) on the bare family $\mathcal{P}_n=\mathrm{Prob}([0,1]^n)$. No probability integral transform, no external summary functions, no enrichment of objects with conditional kernels. The disintegration side uses block-wise joint CDFs as intrinsic, measure-determined 1D summaries, yielding a lossy compression. The combination side reads the same summaries and reconstructs via regular conditional measures, yielding a lossless embedding. We prove that combination followed by disintegration is the identity on admissible inputs, but disintegration followed by combination is not---the information loss is exactly the conditional KL divergence between the true conditional distribution and the conditionally independent product. This asymmetry reveals a hard limit on how much cross-block dependence can be captured by scalar block summaries.

Probability (math.PR); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Mathematical Physics (math-ph); Category Theory (math.CT); Statistics Theory (math.ST)

arXiv:2610.15006 [math.PR]

(or arXiv:2610.15006v1 [math.PR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15006 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 234 words

Related coverage