Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces DEAF, a critical benchmark designed to expose the "text dominance" in Audio Multimodal Large Language Models by testing their reliance on acoustic signals versus textual inference. The study reveals that despite high scores on standard speech tasks, current models often fail to genuinely process audio features like emotional prosody or speaker identity when faced with conflicting text prompts. This work is essential for advancing the field of audio AI by establishing metrics to quantify genuine multimodal understanding rather than semantic hallucination.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

DEAF: A Benchmark for Diagnostic Evaluation of Acoustic Faithfulness in Audio Language Models

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2603.18048v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent Audio Multimodal Large Language Models (Audio MLLMs) demonstrate impressive performance on speech benchmarks, yet it remains unclear whether these models genuinely process acoustic signals or rely on text-based semantic inference. To systematically study this question, we introduce DEAF (Diagnostic Evaluation of Acoustic Faithfulness), a benchmark of over 2,700 conflict stimuli spanning three acoustic dimensions: emotional prosody, background sounds, and speaker identity. Then, we design a controlled multi-level evaluation framework that progressively increases textual influence, ranging from semantic conflicts in the content to misleading prompts and their combination, allowing us to disentangle content-driven bias from prompt-induced sycophancy. We further introduce diagnostic metrics to quantify model reliance on textual cues over acoustic signals. Our evaluation of seven Audio MLLMs reveals a consistent pattern of text dominance: models are sensitive to acoustic variations, yet predictions are predominantly driven by textual inputs, revealing a gap between high performance on standard speech benchmarks and genuine acoustic understanding.

Abstract:Recent Audio Multimodal Large Language Models (Audio MLLMs) demonstrate impressive performance on speech benchmarks, yet it remains unclear whether these models genuinely process acoustic signals or rely on text-based semantic inference. To systematically study this question, we introduce DEAF (Diagnostic Evaluation of Acoustic Faithfulness), a benchmark of over 2,700 conflict stimuli spanning three acoustic dimensions: emotional prosody, background sounds, and speaker identity. Then, we design a controlled multi-level evaluation framework that progressively increases textual influence, ranging from semantic conflicts in the content to misleading prompts and their combination, allowing us to disentangle content-driven bias from prompt-induced sycophancy. We further introduce diagnostic metrics to quantify model reliance on textual cues over acoustic signals. Our evaluation of seven Audio MLLMs reveals a consistent pattern of text dominance: models are sensitive to acoustic variations, yet predictions are predominantly driven by textual inputs, revealing a gap between high performance on standard speech benchmarks and genuine acoustic understanding.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Sound (cs.SD); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)

arXiv:2603.18048 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2603.18048v3 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.18048 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 252 words

Related coverage