aiqbench analysis
This research exposes critical limitations in current ASR and audio language models when handling code-switched speech between English and Yoruba, revealing that aggregate error rates mask severe performance drops at language switch points. The study highlights how generative models often fail as exact transcribers in this context, introducing translation artifacts and prompt leakage instead of faithful transcription. By releasing new metrics and evaluation scripts, the authors provide essential tools for benchmarking systems on low-resource, diacritic-rich African languages where code-switching is prevalent.
Beyond Word Error Rate: A Switch Aware Evaluation of ASR and Audio Language Models on English Yoruba Code-Switched Speech
arXiv:2609.11786v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems and audio language models (audio LMs) now report low error rates on monolingual benchmarks, but their behavior on code switched speech in low resource, diacritic rich languages remains poorly characterized. We present a switch aware evaluation of eleven modern systems (six ASR models and five audio LMs) on English Yoruba code-switched speech, using a deterministic 2000 utterance evaluation set and a shared scoring pipeline. Beyond word error rate (WER), we report switch localized diagnostics: a switch entry token error rate (SETER), windowed switch point error rates, language specific error rates, and a diacritic insensitive WER. Our central finding is that aggregate WER hides code switching behavior. The best system by WER (an ASR model) is statistically indistinguishable from a leading audio LM on WER, yet the audio LM is significantly better on every switch localized metric. Across faithful systems, Yoruba token recognition collapses (error 0.97 for almost all systems) while English tokens are recognized far better, and errors concentrate sharply at switches into Yoruba. Several generative audio LMs fail as exact transcribers, producing translation, verbosity, and prompt leakage that are strongly prompt dependent. We release manifests, metric implementations, and evaluation scripts to support reproducible, switch aware benchmarking for African code switched speech.
Abstract:Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems and audio language models (audio LMs) now report low error rates on monolingual benchmarks, but their behavior on code switched speech in low resource, diacritic rich languages remains poorly characterized. We present a switch aware evaluation of eleven modern systems (six ASR models and five audio LMs) on English Yoruba code-switched speech, using a deterministic 2000 utterance evaluation set and a shared scoring pipeline. Beyond word error rate (WER), we report switch localized diagnostics: a switch entry token error rate (SETER), windowed switch point error rates, language specific error rates, and a diacritic insensitive WER. Our central finding is that aggregate WER hides code switching behavior. The best system by WER (an ASR model) is statistically indistinguishable from a leading audio LM on WER, yet the audio LM is significantly better on every switch localized metric. Across faithful systems, Yoruba token recognition collapses (error 0.97 for almost all systems) while English tokens are recognized far better, and errors concentrate sharply at switches into Yoruba. Several generative audio LMs fail as exact transcribers, producing translation, verbosity, and prompt leakage that are strongly prompt dependent. We release manifests, metric implementations, and evaluation scripts to support reproducible, switch aware benchmarking for African code switched speech.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.11786 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.11786v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.11786 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 305 words
Related coverage
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026
Measuring benchmark optimization in speech recognition
Hugging Face · Aug 21, 2026
The Open ASR Leaderboard Adds Its First Global South Language
Hugging Face · Aug 28, 2026

Frontier AI Risk Report (February–March 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026