aiqbench analysis
This research introduces "non-influenceable causal order," identifying a distinct class of quantum processes where dynamical causality exists independently of past party actions. By formalizing these correlations within the process matrix framework, the study clarifies how indefinite and dynamic causal orders coexist in complex multi-party systems. This theoretical advancement deepens our understanding of fundamental constraints on information flow in future quantum networks.
Correlations and quantum circuits with dynamical causal order
arXiv:2507.07992v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Requiring that the causal structure between different parties is well-defined imposes constraints on the correlations they can establish, which define so-called causal correlations. Some of these are known to have a "dynamical" causal order in the sense that their causal structure is not fixed a priori but is instead established on the fly, with for instance the causal order between future parties depending on some choice of action of parties in the past. Here we identify a new way that the causal order between the parties can be dynamical: with at least four parties, there can be some dynamical order which can nevertheless not be influenced by the actions of past parties. This leads us to introduce an intermediate class of correlations with what we call non-influenceable causal order, in between the set of correlations with static (non-dynamical) causal order and the set of general causal correlations. We then define analogous classes of quantum processes, considering recently introduced classes of quantum circuits with classical or quantum control of causal order---the latter being the largest class within the process matrix formalism known to have a clear interpretation in terms of coherent superpositions of causal orders. This allows us to formalise precisely in which sense certain quantum processes can have both indefinite and dynamical causal order.
Abstract:Requiring that the causal structure between different parties is well-defined imposes constraints on the correlations they can establish, which define so-called causal correlations. Some of these are known to have a "dynamical" causal order in the sense that their causal structure is not fixed a priori but is instead established on the fly, with for instance the causal order between future parties depending on some choice of action of parties in the past. Here we identify a new way that the causal order between the parties can be dynamical: with at least four parties, there can be some dynamical order which can nevertheless not be influenced by the actions of past parties. This leads us to introduce an intermediate class of correlations with what we call non-influenceable causal order, in between the set of correlations with static (non-dynamical) causal order and the set of general causal correlations. We then define analogous classes of quantum processes, considering recently introduced classes of quantum circuits with classical or quantum control of causal order---the latter being the largest class within the process matrix formalism known to have a clear interpretation in terms of coherent superpositions of causal orders. This allows us to formalise precisely in which sense certain quantum processes can have both indefinite and dynamical causal order.
arXiv:2507.07992 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2507.07992v3 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.07992 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 303 words
Related coverage

Is The Brain A Quantum Computer? The Decoherence Numbers Say No
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 13, 2026
Does preservation make sense before we know how to revive?
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026
Certified coherent, informative, and non-entanglement-breaking fixed points of future-referential quantum feedback
arXiv · Aug 17, 2026

Time symmetry in quantum theories and beyond
Quantum Journal · Sep 30, 2026