Corrected Block Sparse Spectral Optimization: Exact Models, Finite Identification, and Local Dynamics

Abstract:The block generalized-power method pairs threshold-based support selection with inexpensive Stiefel updates, but the standard block formulation conflates two nonequivalent objectives and leaves inactive components, threshold ties, and post-selection refitting ill-specified. We rebuild the model from the primal. Eliminating each loading column from the normalized loading-ball problem gives a sum of soft-thresholded Euclidean norms (A-SUM); the squared-threshold objective in common use arises from a quadratic lift (A-SQ). We prove both identities, exhibit a two-component instance whose maximizers disagree, and specify explicit conventions for zero-response columns, ties, rank deficiency, and mask-before-refit. For A-SQ we separate the historical full-polar iteration from a safeguarded Riemannian ascent and prove, for the latter, whole-sequence convergence via a sufficient-ascent lemma, a relative-error lemma, and the Kurdyka-Lojasiewicz property, which applies because the soft-threshold objective and the Stiefel constraint are semi-algebraic. A strict threshold margin then forces finite identification of the support and sign pattern. The post-identification map is ordinary power iteration on the active covariance for a rank-one hard threshold, and the Frechet derivative of a coupled polar map for component-specific supports; a radius-based safe-screening rule follows from the same local analysis. Planted-spike experiments match the predicted identification time and local rates. On modern-AI panels (GPT-2 residual stream, ViT CLS stream, Pitprops) the thresholded block-sparse components match dense PCA on reconstruction and improve on it in monosemanticity and class specialisation. On three native-label scRNA datasets (Zheng17 FACS-sorted PBMCs, 68k donor-A with FACS-correlated labels, Tabula Muris) A-SQ beats dense PCA on cluster-recovery AMI by +0.023 to +0.044 at matched sparsity.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)

arXiv:2610.25721 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2610.25721v1 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.25721 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23460513 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.