Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces CONSPIRED, the first dataset annotating conspiratorial content for cognitive traits to evaluate Large Language Model robustness against specific rhetorical framing. The study reveals a critical safety vulnerability where LLMs reproduce conspiratorial patterns even when they successfully deflect standard fact-checked misinformation, highlighting unique alignment challenges distinct from general hallucination.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

ConspirED: A Dataset for Cognitive Traits of Conspiracy Theories and Large Language Model Safety

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2508.20468v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Conspiracy theories erode public trust in science and institutions while resisting debunking by evolving and absorbing counter-evidence. As AI-generated misinformation becomes increasingly sophisticated, understanding the rhetorical patterns in conspiratorial content is important for developing interventions such as targeted prebunking and assessing AI vulnerabilities. We introduce CONSPIRED (CONSPIR Evaluation Dataset), which captures the cognitive traits of conspiratorial ideation in multi-sentence excerpts (80-120 words) from online conspiracy articles, annotated using the CONSPIR cognitive framework. CONSPIRED is the first dataset of conspiratorial content annotated for general cognitive traits. Using CONSPIRED, we (i) develop computational models that identify conspiratorial traits and the dominant trait in text excerpts, and (ii) evaluate LLM robustness to conspiratorial inputs. We find that LLMs are readily misaligned by conspiratorial framing, reproducing its rhetorical patterns even when successfully deflecting comparable fact-checked misinformation.

Abstract:Conspiracy theories erode public trust in science and institutions while resisting debunking by evolving and absorbing counter-evidence. As AI-generated misinformation becomes increasingly sophisticated, understanding the rhetorical patterns in conspiratorial content is important for developing interventions such as targeted prebunking and assessing AI vulnerabilities. We introduce CONSPIRED (CONSPIR Evaluation Dataset), which captures the cognitive traits of conspiratorial ideation in multi-sentence excerpts (80-120 words) from online conspiracy articles, annotated using the CONSPIR cognitive framework. CONSPIRED is the first dataset of conspiratorial content annotated for general cognitive traits. Using CONSPIRED, we (i) develop computational models that identify conspiratorial traits and the dominant trait in text excerpts, and (ii) evaluate LLM robustness to conspiratorial inputs. We find that LLMs are readily misaligned by conspiratorial framing, reproducing its rhetorical patterns even when successfully deflecting comparable fact-checked misinformation.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2508.20468 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2508.20468v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.20468 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 225 words

Related coverage