aiqbench analysis
This study leverages large language models and regression modeling to analyze the relational harms of QAnon radicalization, mapping personal narratives to specific emotional outcomes like fear, anger, and sadness. By clustering 12,747 stories into distinct personas, the research establishes a computational framework for understanding how ideological collapse impacts families, moving beyond traditional behavioral analysis of conspiracy theorists. The work highlights the critical role of AI in quantifying social consequences and informing interventions for those affected by extreme online radicalization.
Beyond the Rabbit Hole: Mapping the Relational Harms of QAnon Radicalization
arXiv:2601.17658v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large-scale computational research on conspiracy theories has focused exclusively on believers' online behavior, leaving the harm experienced by those closest to them under-examined. This paper bridges this gap by analyzing 12747 stories from r/QAnonCasualties, an online support group for people who have ``lost'' someone to conspiracy beliefs. We design a computational pipeline to extract fine-grained thematic traits from personal narratives and cluster them into six coherent radicalization personas, which we then link to the emotional toll reported by narrators via LLM-assisted emotion detection and regression modeling. We find that personas are meaningful predictors of specific emotional harms: radicalization perceived as a deliberate ideological choice is associated with anger and disgust, while personas marked by personal and cognitive collapse correspond to fear and sadness. This work provides an empirically grounded computational framework for understanding the relational harms of radicalization, opening new avenues for research into its wider social consequences.
Abstract:Large-scale computational research on conspiracy theories has focused exclusively on believers' online behavior, leaving the harm experienced by those closest to them under-examined. This paper bridges this gap by analyzing 12747 stories from r/QAnonCasualties, an online support group for people who have ``lost'' someone to conspiracy beliefs. We design a computational pipeline to extract fine-grained thematic traits from personal narratives and cluster them into six coherent radicalization personas, which we then link to the emotional toll reported by narrators via LLM-assisted emotion detection and regression modeling. We find that personas are meaningful predictors of specific emotional harms: radicalization perceived as a deliberate ideological choice is associated with anger and disgust, while personas marked by personal and cognitive collapse correspond to fear and sadness. This work provides an empirically grounded computational framework for understanding the relational harms of radicalization, opening new avenues for research into its wider social consequences.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2601.17658 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2601.17658v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.17658 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 241 words
Related coverage

How Would We Know? Reflections on trying to make AI go well amid deep uncertainty
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026

Koopman Theory and Metaethics
LessWrong · Sep 19, 2026

Sen. Adam Schiff on AI regulation, free speech, and impeaching Trump one more time
The Verge · Oct 5, 2026
If This Were a Test, How Much Would It Cost?
LessWrong · Jun 16, 2026