Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

CITBench introduces a critical evaluation framework for LLMs handling interactive tabular workflows, addressing the gap left by single-turn benchmarks that ignore evolving multi-step requirements. The study reveals significant performance degradation in current models when faced with complex table structures and noisy user interactions, highlighting persistent challenges in planning and structural awareness essential for real-world data tasks.
Sources coveringarXiv, AWS, Quantum Zeitgeist, prnewswire.com
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CITBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Interactive Tabular Data Processing with LLMs

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.00018v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tabular data processing is central to data work, and LLM-based assistants have recently shown promising capabilities in supporting such tasks. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on table reasoning under single-turn, fully specified instructions, underrepresenting complex table processing that unfolds through multi-turn interactions with evolving user requirements. To bridge this gap, we introduce CITBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLMs on interactive tabular data processing. CITBench features a comprehensive taxonomy across four high-level categories--table matching, cleaning, augmentation, and transformation--spanning 18 task types and 1,296 instances curated from datasets across diverse domains. The benchmark supports both offline and online evaluation, where the online setting models multi-turn interactions under constrained operation procedures and structured task scripts, capturing key potential behavioral characteristics of user-in-the-loop tabular data processing. We evaluate a broad suite of open-source and closed-source LLMs on CITBench, revealing a consistent trend: while current models perform well on simple tables and rules, their performance degrades significantly with increasing table complexity, tighter rule dependencies, and noisy multi-turn interaction simulations. These results highlight persistent challenges in understanding, planning, and table-structure awareness for LLMs in extended interactive data processing scenarios.

Abstract:Tabular data processing is central to data work, and LLM-based assistants have recently shown promising capabilities in supporting such tasks. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on table reasoning under single-turn, fully specified instructions, underrepresenting complex table processing that unfolds through multi-turn interactions with evolving user requirements. To bridge this gap, we introduce CITBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLMs on interactive tabular data processing. CITBench features a comprehensive taxonomy across four high-level categories--table matching, cleaning, augmentation, and transformation--spanning 18 task types and 1,296 instances curated from datasets across diverse domains. The benchmark supports both offline and online evaluation, where the online setting models multi-turn interactions under constrained operation procedures and structured task scripts, capturing key potential behavioral characteristics of user-in-the-loop tabular data processing. We evaluate a broad suite of open-source and closed-source LLMs on CITBench, revealing a consistent trend: while current models perform well on simple tables and rules, their performance degrades significantly with increasing table complexity, tighter rule dependencies, and noisy multi-turn interaction simulations. These results highlight persistent challenges in understanding, planning, and table-structure awareness for LLMs in extended interactive data processing scenarios.

Databases (cs.DB); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.00018 [cs.DB]

(or arXiv:2608.00018v1 [cs.DB] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.00018 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 278 words

Related coverage