aiqbench analysis
ChainWorld addresses the critical evaluation gap in computer use agents by composing atomic tasks into long-horizon workloads, revealing that current models struggle significantly with multi-step state retention and session management. The study demonstrates that while single-turn prompts fail primarily on precision issues, multi-turn protocols expose deeper challenges in maintaining coherent progress across fragmented turns, highlighting a fundamental limitation in existing agent architectures for realistic desktop scenarios.
ChainWorld: Composing Long-Horizon Desktop Workloads from Atomic OSWorld Tasks
arXiv:2606.21654v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Computer use agents are evaluated almost exclusively on atomic desktop tasks, but realistic desktop work requires sustaining state across multiple objectives. We study this gap with ChainWorld, which composes atomic OSWorld tasks into long horizon desktop workloads through directional compatibility search while preserving the source evaluators. The resulting workload contains 347 chains of length two to four and compares two renderings of the same task sequence. In single turn evaluation, all tasks are presented together in one prompt. In multi turn evaluation, tasks are revealed one at a time. Across four current computer use agents, maximum chain completion is 31%. Multi turn evaluation improves completion for three models, but both protocols remain challenging. The two protocols also expose different failure profiles. Single turn failures concentrate on artifact precision, while multi turn failures more often reflect session management problems such as fragmented progress and later turn disengagement.
Abstract:Computer use agents are evaluated almost exclusively on atomic desktop tasks, but realistic desktop work requires sustaining state across multiple objectives. We study this gap with ChainWorld, which composes atomic OSWorld tasks into long horizon desktop workloads through directional compatibility search while preserving the source evaluators. The resulting workload contains 347 chains of length two to four and compares two renderings of the same task sequence. In single turn evaluation, all tasks are presented together in one prompt. In multi turn evaluation, tasks are revealed one at a time. Across four current computer use agents, maximum chain completion is 31%. Multi turn evaluation improves completion for three models, but both protocols remain challenging. The two protocols also expose different failure profiles. Single turn failures concentrate on artifact precision, while multi turn failures more often reflect session management problems such as fragmented progress and later turn disengagement.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2606.21654 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.21654v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.21654 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 242 words
Related coverage

Amazon Research Awards recipients announced
Amazon Science · May 27, 2026
AtomBridge: Agentic VLA Inference Plugin for Long-Horizon Tasks in Scientific Experiments
arXiv · Aug 17, 2026
ATOM: Unlocking Extreme AMD Instinct Inference with Software-Hardware Co-Optimization
AMD · Jun 15, 2026
Benchmarking Kimi-K3 Across vLLM, SGLang, and ATOM on MI350X
AMD · Sep 22, 2026