aiqbench analysis
This paper proposes a second-order cone relaxation for verifying the robustness of neural networks, positioning it between fast but loose linear programming bounds and tight but expensive semidefinite ones. The reported gains are a monotone accuracy-versus-compute trade-off, competitive results against alpha,beta-CROWN on MNIST and CIFAR-10, and large speedups over SDP methods. For readers, the practical question is whether tighter certificates at moderate cost can scale to the network sizes used in safety-critical deployments, which the abstract's benchmarks only partially address.
Certified Robustness via Sparse Second-Order Cone Relaxations
arXiv:2610.16016v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Certified robustness is critical for deploying neural networks in safety-sensitive settings, but computing exact certificates typically requires solving nonconvex optimization problems. Practical verifiers use convex relaxations: linear programming (LP) relaxations are scalable but often too conservative, whereas semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxations can be substantially tighter but are computationally expensive. We introduce a hierarchy of second-order cone programming (SOCP) relaxations that provide stronger certificates than LP while avoiding the cost of global positive-semidefinite constraints. Our construction combines convex-hull relaxations of ReLU activations, selective McCormick lifting over certified variable bounds, and second-order cone constraints induced by 2-by-2 principal minors. Adding these constraints progressively yields a monotone hierarchy of increasingly tight bounds with a controllable computation-tightness trade-off. On fully connected and convolutional networks on MNIST and CIFAR-10, SOCP-based verification improves certified robust accuracy over LP-based verification and is competitive with alpha,beta-CROWN, while remaining orders of magnitude faster than SDP-based verification. These results position selective second-order constraints as a practical middle ground between scalable LP-based and tight SDP-based certification. Finally, we introduce class-optimized robust evaluation (CORE), which applies tighter relaxations only to target classes not certified by cheaper ones. On the fully connected MNIST benchmark, CORE variants match SDP-cert's certified robust accuracy while reducing average verification time by up to 86.30%.
Abstract:Certified robustness is critical for deploying neural networks in safety-sensitive settings, but computing exact certificates typically requires solving nonconvex optimization problems. Practical verifiers use convex relaxations: linear programming (LP) relaxations are scalable but often too conservative, whereas semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxations can be substantially tighter but are computationally expensive. We introduce a hierarchy of second-order cone programming (SOCP) relaxations that provide stronger certificates than LP while avoiding the cost of global positive-semidefinite constraints. Our construction combines convex-hull relaxations of ReLU activations, selective McCormick lifting over certified variable bounds, and second-order cone constraints induced by 2-by-2 principal minors. Adding these constraints progressively yields a monotone hierarchy of increasingly tight bounds with a controllable computation-tightness trade-off. On fully connected and convolutional networks on MNIST and CIFAR-10, SOCP-based verification improves certified robust accuracy over LP-based verification and is competitive with alpha,beta-CROWN, while remaining orders of magnitude faster than SDP-based verification. These results position selective second-order constraints as a practical middle ground between scalable LP-based and tight SDP-based certification. Finally, we introduce class-optimized robust evaluation (CORE), which applies tighter relaxations only to target classes not certified by cheaper ones. On the fully connected MNIST benchmark, CORE variants match SDP-cert's certified robust accuracy while reducing average verification time by up to 86.30%.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.16016 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.16016v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.16016 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 301 words
Related coverage

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026
Generalized-CVO: Fast and Correspondence-Free Local Point Cloud Registration with Second Order Riemannian Optimization
arXiv · Jun 10, 2026
Sparsity Regularized and Robust Mean Variance Portfolio Selection Under Ellipsoidal Uncertainty
arXiv · Sep 11, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026