Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

CellScientist introduces a protocol-constrained workflow that leverages Large Language Models to generate auditable revision trajectories for cellular perturbation-response modeling. By enforcing fixed task contracts and routing discrepancies to specific components, the system improves predictor performance while maintaining transparency into model evolution. This approach addresses critical reliability issues in AI-driven scientific discovery where unconstrained generation can lead to invalid implementations or semantic drift.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CellScientist: From Execution Feedback to Auditable Model-Revision Trajectories for Cellular Perturbation Prediction

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.07335v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Cellular perturbation-response modeling requires coordinated choices of representations, fusion mechanisms, objectives, and training procedures. Large language models (LLMs) can propose executable candidates, but unconstrained revision can produce invalid implementations, change task semantics, or discard useful components. We present CellScientist, a protocol-constrained workflow that converts execution and validation feedback into auditable model-revision trajectories. It records design states and outcomes, routes discrepancies to specific components, and applies local revisions under a fixed task contract. A matched-budget study fixes the candidate language, predictor, fitting, and evaluator: structured revision finds better held-out predictors at small budgets under two LLM backbones. Operational audits link history to fewer repeated proposals, contract checks to contained violations, and discrepancy routing to targeted repairs. Refits of two frozen designs on an independently acquired cohort evaluate external predictive utility. Open-workflow trajectories retain improvements, regressions, and failures, while transcriptomic and single-cell searches extend application to additional response spaces. CellScientist produces both a selected predictor and an inspectable record of its development. Project page: https://limengran98.github.io/CellScientist/.

Abstract:Cellular perturbation-response modeling requires coordinated choices of representations, fusion mechanisms, objectives, and training procedures. Large language models (LLMs) can propose executable candidates, but unconstrained revision can produce invalid implementations, change task semantics, or discard useful components. We present CellScientist, a protocol-constrained workflow that converts execution and validation feedback into auditable model-revision trajectories. It records design states and outcomes, routes discrepancies to specific components, and applies local revisions under a fixed task contract. A matched-budget study fixes the candidate language, predictor, fitting, and evaluator: structured revision finds better held-out predictors at small budgets under two LLM backbones. Operational audits link history to fewer repeated proposals, contract checks to contained violations, and discrepancy routing to targeted repairs. Refits of two frozen designs on an independently acquired cohort evaluate external predictive utility. Open-workflow trajectories retain improvements, regressions, and failures, while transcriptomic and single-cell searches extend application to additional response spaces. CellScientist produces both a selected predictor and an inspectable record of its development. Project page: this https URL.

38 pages, 7 figures. Mengran Li and Bo Li contributed equally. Corresponding author: Zelin Zang. Project page: this https URL

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

arXiv:2605.07335 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2605.07335v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.07335 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 280 words

Related coverage