aiqbench analysis
This research introduces an online framework that transforms transient interaction traces into a persistent, versioned library of reusable procedures for computer-use agents. By updating this skill library without altering model parameters, the system achieves significant performance gains across multiple graphical interface domains while maintaining auditability. The study highlights that repeated revisions do not guarantee recovery of original tasks, offering critical insights into the stability and limitations of evolving procedural memory in AI agents.
From Interaction Traces to Persistent Skills: Online Evolution for Computer-Use Agents
arXiv:2609.04869v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computer-use agents can execute increasingly complex tasks in graphical interfaces, but their interaction experience is typically transient: procedural knowledge acquired from one rollout is not systematically retained, refined, and reused in later tasks. Existing skill libraries provide external procedural knowledge, yet their incremental value over the same agent operating without skills, as well as their longitudinal dynamics under repeated interaction, remain insufficiently characterized. We present an online skill-evolution framework that converts interaction trajectories and evaluator feedback into a persistent, versioned library of reusable procedures. Each iteration executes against a frozen library snapshot, and evidence-guided skill updates become available in subsequent iterations without changing model parameters. We compare the full evolving-library system with a configuration-matched empty-library control across four OSWorld application domains under the same fixed action-generation and GUI-grounding stack, task sets, and iteration horizons. Following a five-iteration empty-library warm-up, Full attains a higher post-warm-up mean evaluator score in all four observed domain runs, with mean differences ranging from 5.7 to 18.6 percentage points and domain-dependent temporal stability. In GIMP, provenance-aware analysis reveals retrieval across task-of-origin boundaries and revision churn, where repeated accepted edits fail to recover the originating task. These findings characterize evolving skill libraries as auditable, shared procedural memory that can improve a fixed computer-use stack, while showing that their benefits are conditional and repeated revision does not guarantee recovery. Code is released at https://github.com/LongtaoHu/Skill-Evo4GUI.
Abstract:Computer-use agents can execute increasingly complex tasks in graphical interfaces, but their interaction experience is typically transient: procedural knowledge acquired from one rollout is not systematically retained, refined, and reused in later tasks. Existing skill libraries provide external procedural knowledge, yet their incremental value over the same agent operating without skills, as well as their longitudinal dynamics under repeated interaction, remain insufficiently characterized. We present an online skill-evolution framework that converts interaction trajectories and evaluator feedback into a persistent, versioned library of reusable procedures. Each iteration executes against a frozen library snapshot, and evidence-guided skill updates become available in subsequent iterations without changing model parameters. We compare the full evolving-library system with a configuration-matched empty-library control across four OSWorld application domains under the same fixed action-generation and GUI-grounding stack, task sets, and iteration horizons. Following a five-iteration empty-library warm-up, Full attains a higher post-warm-up mean evaluator score in all four observed domain runs, with mean differences ranging from 5.7 to 18.6 percentage points and domain-dependent temporal stability. In GIMP, provenance-aware analysis reveals retrieval across task-of-origin boundaries and revision churn, where repeated accepted edits fail to recover the originating task. These findings characterize evolving skill libraries as auditable, shared procedural memory that can improve a fixed computer-use stack, while showing that their benefits are conditional and repeated revision does not guarantee recovery. Code is released at this https URL.
10 pages, 2 figures, and 2 tables. Code: this https URL
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.04869 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.04869v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04869 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 333 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

Claude Code’s Next Era — Thariq Shihipar, Anthropic
Latent Space · Sep 29, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 18, 2026