aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a novel framework for "causal retention" in interactive agents, demonstrating how to decouple task performance from the specific intervention mechanisms an AI retains. By implementing evidence-gated writing and readout filtering, the study achieves near-perfect accuracy on mechanism probes while maintaining stable responses, even when tested on shifted causal models like TD-MPC2. The findings offer a rigorous mathematical foundation for building more interpretable and robust autonomous systems that generalize beyond their training distributions.
Causal Retention in Interactive Agents: Interface Factorization and Selective Adaptation
arXiv:2609.30650v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Task performance need not determine which intervention mechanism an agent retains. We study causal retention: whether a frozen learned state answers a mechanism-probe map fixed independently of training, including action, context, direct target, value, and delay. For finite structural causal model classes, the optimal probe error is a Bayes decision risk. It vanishes exactly when every learning-interface fiber lies within one probe-answer fiber; any state obtained by post-processing that interface inherits the same lower bound. A posterior-coverage theorem characterizes budgeted retesting, while an exact edit decomposition shows that the shifted set is the unique support of an error-free target update. Causal Core implements these conditions through evidence-gated writing, readout filtering, temporal credit, hidden-context setup, and local diagnostic updates. Experiments cover finite causal systems, continuous simulators, an official TD-MPC2 world model, and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct. A frozen Qwen last-layer probe reaches 0.958 balanced accuracy on source mechanisms but 0.583 on changed delays; the gated mechanism state reaches 1.000 and accepts only 0.056 of synchronized-readout candidates. In TD-MPC2, five target states per actuator recover effect-sign accuracy from 0.057 to 0.948 without degrading stable responses. Causal retention is therefore distinct from task sufficiency and source-domain decodability.
Abstract:Task performance need not determine which intervention mechanism an agent retains. We study causal retention: whether a frozen learned state answers a mechanism-probe map fixed independently of training, including action, context, direct target, value, and delay. For finite structural causal model classes, the optimal probe error is a Bayes decision risk. It vanishes exactly when every learning-interface fiber lies within one probe-answer fiber; any state obtained by post-processing that interface inherits the same lower bound. A posterior-coverage theorem characterizes budgeted retesting, while an exact edit decomposition shows that the shifted set is the unique support of an error-free target update. Causal Core implements these conditions through evidence-gated writing, readout filtering, temporal credit, hidden-context setup, and local diagnostic updates. Experiments cover finite causal systems, continuous simulators, an official TD-MPC2 world model, and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct. A frozen Qwen last-layer probe reaches 0.958 balanced accuracy on source mechanisms but 0.583 on changed delays; the gated mechanism state reaches 1.000 and accepts only 0.056 of synchronized-readout candidates. In TD-MPC2, five target states per actuator recover effect-sign accuracy from 0.057 to 0.948 without degrading stable responses. Causal retention is therefore distinct from task sufficiency and source-domain decodability.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.30650 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.30650v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30650 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 291 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 6, 2026

AgentOps: Operationalize agentic AI at scale with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Jun 1, 2026

Automate legacy web applications with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Browser Tool
AWS · Aug 13, 2026