Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper advances causal inference theory by formalizing identifiability hierarchies within partial causal abstractions, addressing limitations of fully specified graphs in high-dimensional settings. The work provides rigorous mathematical distinctions for deriving causal effects from equivalence classes of compatible graphs without requiring uniform derivations across all members.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Causal Effect Identifiability in Causal Abstractions: A Strict Hierarchy of Criteria

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.13520v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Identifying causal effects from observational data typically requires a fully specified causal graph, an assumption that is often unrealistic in complex or high-dimensional settings. Causal abstractions address this limitation by retaining only partial causal information, thereby defining equivalence classes of compatible causal graphs. In this paper, we study causal effect identifiability directly at the level of these graph collections, rather than at the level of individual causal diagrams. We formalize several notions of identifiability in this setting and organize them into a hierarchy that clarifies their relationships and differences. In particular, we establish that a causal effect may be identified over a collection of graphs without admitting a single causal derivation that holds uniformly across all compatible graphs. These results help reveal gaps and clarify ambiguities in the existing literature.

Abstract:Identifying causal effects from observational data typically requires a fully specified causal graph, an assumption that is often unrealistic in complex or high-dimensional settings. Causal abstractions address this limitation by retaining only partial causal information, thereby defining equivalence classes of compatible causal graphs. In this paper, we study causal effect identifiability directly at the level of these graph collections, rather than at the level of individual causal diagrams. We formalize several notions of identifiability in this setting and organize them into a hierarchy that clarifies their relationships and differences. In particular, we establish that a causal effect may be identified over a collection of graphs without admitting a single causal derivation that holds uniformly across all compatible graphs. These results help reveal gaps and clarify ambiguities in the existing literature.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.13520 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.13520v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.13520 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 224 words

Related coverage