Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes a rigorous framework for quantifying the effective dimension of noisy quantum processors by introducing three distinct bottlenecks: compressibility, simulability, and embeddability. By mapping white-noise thresholds across these categories, the study clarifies how noise limits the coherent subspace available for computation as system size increases. This work is essential for understanding the practical scalability limits of universal quantum devices in realistic, imperfect environments.
Sources coveringarXiv, AMD
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The bottleneck dimension of quantum operations

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.25010v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Programmable quantum devices nominally act on a Hilbert space whose dimension grows exponentially with the number of constituents, but the presence of noise makes it unlikely that they remain coherent across all of this immense Hilbert space. Then, what is the effective coherent quantum dimension that should be associated with such imperfect devices? To answer this question we here introduce an operational basis-independent framework which imposes a dimension bottleneck on the programmable transformations. Concretely we ask how strongly the quantum information they process can be compressed. Formalizing this idea we identify three inequivalent notions, termed $d$-compressibility, $d$-simulability and $d$-embeddability, which differ in the causal structure used to impose the bottleneck and form a strict hierarchy. The framework unifies several existing notions: joint measurability and simulability of quantum measurements, and the absolute dimensionality of state ensembles, are recovered as special cases. We illustrate the hierarchy with noisy qubit measurements in complementary bases, and we determine the white-noise thresholds at which the set of all noisy unitary channels in dimension $n$, a noisy universal quantum processor, becomes $d$-compressible, $d$-simulable and $d$-embeddable. The thresholds confirm the expectation -- maintaining coherence across the full Hilbert space becomes increasingly demanding as the nominal dimension $n$ increases.

Abstract:Programmable quantum devices nominally act on a Hilbert space whose dimension grows exponentially with the number of constituents, but the presence of noise makes it unlikely that they remain coherent across all of this immense Hilbert space. Then, what is the effective coherent quantum dimension that should be associated with such imperfect devices? To answer this question we here introduce an operational basis-independent framework which imposes a dimension bottleneck on the programmable transformations. Concretely we ask how strongly the quantum information they process can be compressed. Formalizing this idea we identify three inequivalent notions, termed $d$-compressibility, $d$-simulability and $d$-embeddability, which differ in the causal structure used to impose the bottleneck and form a strict hierarchy. The framework unifies several existing notions: joint measurability and simulability of quantum measurements, and the absolute dimensionality of state ensembles, are recovered as special cases. We illustrate the hierarchy with noisy qubit measurements in complementary bases, and we determine the white-noise thresholds at which the set of all noisy unitary channels in dimension $n$, a noisy universal quantum processor, becomes $d$-compressible, $d$-simulable and $d$-embeddable. The thresholds confirm the expectation -- maintaining coherence across the full Hilbert space becomes increasingly demanding as the nominal dimension $n$ increases.

arXiv:2608.25010 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2608.25010v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25010 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 290 words

Related coverage