Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces CARF, a novel framework for robot learning that leverages failure-critical behaviors by contrasting them against successful progress segments. By employing a flow-matching objective that simultaneously attracts the policy toward informative trajectories and repels it from failure modes, the method enables more robust learning from imperfect demonstration data. The approach demonstrates consistent improvements across diverse scenarios, effectively addressing the challenge of utilizing negative examples in imitation learning.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CARF: Contrastive Attraction-Repulsion of Failure-Guided Flow Matching

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.21982v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robot demonstration collection often produces imperfect or failed trajectories in addition to successful demonstrations. Existing methods typically exploit failed trajectories by identifying segments that still make progress toward task completion, but largely overlook \textit{failure-critical behaviors} that directly lead to task failure. Here we argue that these two types of segments provide fundamentally asymmetric supervision: progressive segments should be imitated, whereas failure-critical segments should be explicitly avoided. Based on this observation, we propose CARF, a Contrastive Attraction-Repulsion of Failure-guided framework for learning from imperfect robot data. CARF introduces a progress-based importance scorer, trained solely on successful expert demonstrations and its perturbation results, to estimate step-wise contributions toward task completion and identify informative regions in failed trajectories. These scores guide a unified flow-matching objective that attracts the policy toward progressive behaviors and repels it from failure-critical ones, while excluding ambiguous segments. This enables more comprehensive utilization of imperfect data and avoids unreliable supervision from ambiguous failure segments. Extensive experiments in simulation and the real world demonstrate consistent improvements over competing baselines across diverse failure scenarios, with ablations further validating the effectiveness of the proposed scoring and attraction-repulsion mechanisms. Our website is https://zhao-sq.github.io/carf/#.

Abstract:Robot demonstration collection often produces imperfect or failed trajectories in addition to successful demonstrations. Existing methods typically exploit failed trajectories by identifying segments that still make progress toward task completion, but largely overlook \textit{failure-critical behaviors} that directly lead to task failure. Here we argue that these two types of segments provide fundamentally asymmetric supervision: progressive segments should be imitated, whereas failure-critical segments should be explicitly avoided. Based on this observation, we propose CARF, a Contrastive Attraction-Repulsion of Failure-guided framework for learning from imperfect robot data. CARF introduces a progress-based importance scorer, trained solely on successful expert demonstrations and its perturbation results, to estimate step-wise contributions toward task completion and identify informative regions in failed trajectories. These scores guide a unified flow-matching objective that attracts the policy toward progressive behaviors and repels it from failure-critical ones, while excluding ambiguous segments. This enables more comprehensive utilization of imperfect data and avoids unreliable supervision from ambiguous failure segments. Extensive experiments in simulation and the real world demonstrate consistent improvements over competing baselines across diverse failure scenarios, with ablations further validating the effectiveness of the proposed scoring and attraction-repulsion mechanisms. Our website is this https URL.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.21982 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.21982v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21982 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 285 words

Related coverage