Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses the critical reliability gap in using LLMs for generating structured data by introducing DNBENCH, a rigorous benchmark for database normalization tasks ranging from 1NF to BCNF. The study reveals persistent failures in dependency inference and constraint reconstruction but demonstrates that a multi-agent framework (MARS) can significantly improve structural accuracy and logical validity. For practitioners relying on AI to manage complex schemas, this work provides essential metrics for evaluating the trustworthiness of automated database design tools.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Can LLMs Normalize Databases? A Benchmark and Multi-Agent Framework for Schema Normalization

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.11141v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate structured outputs, but their reliability remains unclear when those outputs must satisfy database-level constraints. We study this issue through database normalization, involving reasoning about functional dependencies, lossless join decompositions, and inter-table constraints. We introduce a Database Normalization Benchmark (DNBENCH), comprising 3,275 samples for evaluating LLM-driven database normalization from 1NF to BCNF. DNBENCH uses a three-axis protocol to measure semantic equivalence, structural accuracy, and logical validity. Across Single, Complex, and Real World levels, DNBENCH uncovers recurring failures in dependency inference, schema decomposition, and inter-table constraint reconstruction. We further propose Multi-Agent Reasoning for Schemas (MARS), which separates evidence extraction, violation diagnosis, and decomposition planning from schema generation and verification. MARS improves the DNB-SCORE by 82.0% over the single-prompt baseline. All artifacts will be released upon acceptance.

Title:Can LLMs Normalize Databases? A Benchmark and Multi-Agent Framework for Schema Normalization

Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate structured outputs, but their reliability remains unclear when those outputs must satisfy database-level constraints. We study this issue through database normalization, involving reasoning about functional dependencies, lossless join decompositions, and inter-table constraints. We introduce a Database Normalization Benchmark (DNBENCH), comprising 3,275 samples for evaluating LLM-driven database normalization from 1NF to BCNF. DNBENCH uses a three-axis protocol to measure semantic equivalence, structural accuracy, and logical validity. Across Single, Complex, and Real World levels, DNBENCH uncovers recurring failures in dependency inference, schema decomposition, and inter-table constraint reconstruction. We further propose Multi-Agent Reasoning for Schemas (MARS), which separates evidence extraction, violation diagnosis, and decomposition planning from schema generation and verification. MARS improves the DNB-SCORE by 82.0% over the single-prompt baseline. All artifacts will be released upon acceptance.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2609.11141 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.11141v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.11141 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 240 words

Related coverage