Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research demonstrates that predicting future vehicle trajectories using only kinematic state history—without visual or sensor fusion inputs—is sufficient for high-precision safety applications like Automatic Emergency Braking. By leveraging autoregressive and flow-matching architectures, the model achieves low-latency inference on automotive ECUs while significantly reducing false positives in critical braking scenarios.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Zeitgeist, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

BLInD: Learning Driver Intent as a Distribution over Future Ego Trajectories

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.13941v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present BLInD (Blind Learned Intent Distribution), a compact network that maps recent vehicle-state history (e.g. speed, curvature, indicator, and vehicle type) to a top-k distribution of future ego trajectories, with no camera, LiDAR, map, or object-track inputs. We find that vehiclestate history alone is sufficient to learn a useful multimodal distribution over near-term ego trajectories, and its low-latency nature makes it well-suited for safety-critical deployment. We investigate two distribution architectures, autoregressive (AR) and flow-matching, and train on both mixed-platform opensource and Wayve datasets. Both generalize without datasetspecific adaptation; the flow-matching model achieves best topk ADE/FDE of 0.15/0.37 m on Wayve, 0.15/0.36 m on Waymo, and 0.28/0.59 m on nuScenes, with the AR model reaching comparable coverage. Integrating the distributions into an AEB trigger task, a strict all-candidates policy reduces false positives from 1.51% to 0.11% with AR (13.7x reduction, 94.9% TP) and to 0.06% with flow-matching (25.1x reduction, 98.7% TP) compared to a 1-CTRV policy with 100% true positive score. BLInD runs in 0.87 ms with the AR head and 2.9 ms with the flow-matching head on an NVIDIA DRIVE Orin ECU making it compatible with real-time deployment on automotive ECUs. While existing learned distribution models rely on scene context and blind vehicle-state models typically collapse to a single path, BLInD is learned, blind, and cross-domain simultaneously, a combination not demonstrated by prior work. These results show that such a distribution provides a controllable and plausible intent sampling interface for downstream systems, with AEB as one instantiation.

Abstract:We present BLInD (Blind Learned Intent Distribution), a compact network that maps recent vehicle-state history (e.g. speed, curvature, indicator, and vehicle type) to a top-k distribution of future ego trajectories, with no camera, LiDAR, map, or object-track inputs. We find that vehiclestate history alone is sufficient to learn a useful multimodal distribution over near-term ego trajectories, and its low-latency nature makes it well-suited for safety-critical deployment. We investigate two distribution architectures, autoregressive (AR) and flow-matching, and train on both mixed-platform opensource and Wayve datasets. Both generalize without datasetspecific adaptation; the flow-matching model achieves best topk ADE/FDE of 0.15/0.37 m on Wayve, 0.15/0.36 m on Waymo, and 0.28/0.59 m on nuScenes, with the AR model reaching comparable coverage. Integrating the distributions into an AEB trigger task, a strict all-candidates policy reduces false positives from 1.51% to 0.11% with AR (13.7x reduction, 94.9% TP) and to 0.06% with flow-matching (25.1x reduction, 98.7% TP) compared to a 1-CTRV policy with 100% true positive score. BLInD runs in 0.87 ms with the AR head and 2.9 ms with the flow-matching head on an NVIDIA DRIVE Orin ECU making it compatible with real-time deployment on automotive ECUs. While existing learned distribution models rely on scene context and blind vehicle-state models typically collapse to a single path, BLInD is learned, blind, and cross-domain simultaneously, a combination not demonstrated by prior work. These results show that such a distribution provides a controllable and plausible intent sampling interface for downstream systems, with AEB as one instantiation.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.13941 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.13941v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13941 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 347 words

Related coverage