aiqbench analysis
This paper advances offline reinforcement learning theory by extending pessimism-based guarantees to parameterized policies with continuous action spaces, overcoming previous limitations of state-wise mirror descent methods. By linking mirror descent to natural policy gradients, the authors resolve contextual coupling issues and provide a theoretical unification between offline RL and imitation learning that is crucial for scalable algorithm design.
Beyond State-Wise Mirror Descent: Offline Policy Optimization with Parametric Policies
arXiv:2602.23811v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We investigate the theoretical aspects of offline reinforcement learning (RL) under general function approximation. While prior works (e.g., Xie et al., 2021) have established the theoretical foundations of learning a good policy from offline data via pessimism, existing algorithms that are computationally tractable (often in an oracle-efficient sense), such as PSPI, only apply to finite and small action spaces. Moreover, these algorithms rely on state-wise mirror descent and require actors to be implicitly induced from the critic functions, failing to accommodate standalone policy parameterization which is ubiquitous in practice. In this work, we address these limitations and extend the theoretical guarantees to parameterized policy classes over large or continuous action spaces. When extending mirror descent to parameterized policies, we identify contextual coupling as the core difficulty, and show how connecting mirror descent to natural policy gradient leads to novel analyses, guarantees, and algorithmic insights, including a surprising unification between offline RL and imitation learning.
Abstract:We investigate the theoretical aspects of offline reinforcement learning (RL) under general function approximation. While prior works (e.g., Xie et al., 2021) have established the theoretical foundations of learning a good policy from offline data via pessimism, existing algorithms that are computationally tractable (often in an oracle-efficient sense), such as PSPI, only apply to finite and small action spaces. Moreover, these algorithms rely on state-wise mirror descent and require actors to be implicitly induced from the critic functions, failing to accommodate standalone policy parameterization which is ubiquitous in practice. In this work, we address these limitations and extend the theoretical guarantees to parameterized policy classes over large or continuous action spaces. When extending mirror descent to parameterized policies, we identify contextual coupling as the core difficulty, and show how connecting mirror descent to natural policy gradient leads to novel analyses, guarantees, and algorithmic insights, including a surprising unification between offline RL and imitation learning.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2602.23811 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2602.23811v5 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.23811 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 249 words
Related coverage
Value Mirror Descent for Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · Sep 24, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026
OnlineQAT: On-Policy Distillation for Ultra-Low-Bit Large Language Models
arXiv · Oct 8, 2026

DynoSim: Simulating the Pareto Frontier
NVIDIA · May 29, 2026