aiqbench analysis
This research introduces Bayesian Deck-of-cards-based Ordinal Regression (B-DOR), a novel machine learning framework that quantifies preference intensity using blank cards inserted between ranked alternatives. By reformulating the problem through cumulative-link likelihoods and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, the method offers robust probabilistic inference for decision-making under uncertainty. The study demonstrates improved accuracy in composite indicator construction, particularly when utilizing multi-step elicitation to reduce cognitive load on decision-makers.
Bayesian Deck-of-cards-based Ordinal Regression with Sequential Preference Elicitation
arXiv:2609.23212v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Deck-of-cards-based Ordinal Regression (DOR) infers a value function from a ranking of reference alternatives in which the Decision Maker (DM) inserts blank cards between consecutive levels to express preference intensity. DOR, and its stochastic extension (SMAA-DOR), treat these answers as hard constraints defining a set of compatible value functions. We propose B-DOR, a probabilistic reformulation of DOR in which each pair of adjacent levels yields an ordinal observation, the declared direction and the number of cards, modelled through a cumulative-link likelihood that relates the number of blank cards to the latent value difference between alternatives. Two Bayesian inference algorithms are proposed: BAYES-DOR samples the whole posterior distribution by Hamiltonian Monte Carlo; FTRL-DOR tracks the maximum a posteriori estimate by constrained convex optimization. Moreover, through a multi-step elicitation process, elicitation can be spread over several short sessions reducing the cognitive burden on the DM. Both algorithms enjoy logarithmic regret bounds for prediction that hold for any sequence of DM responses and that guide the choice of the prior hyperparameters. A Monte Carlo study over 768 configurations shows that accuracy grows with the number of sessions, that blank cards add significant information over preference directions alone, that both algorithms maintain good performance under inconsistent answers, and that both outperform DOR and SMAA-DOR. An illustrative application to Italian regional healthcare performance demonstrates the practical applicability of the approach for building composite indicators.
Abstract:The Deck-of-cards-based Ordinal Regression (DOR) infers a value function from a ranking of reference alternatives in which the Decision Maker (DM) inserts blank cards between consecutive levels to express preference intensity. DOR, and its stochastic extension (SMAA-DOR), treat these answers as hard constraints defining a set of compatible value functions. We propose B-DOR, a probabilistic reformulation of DOR in which each pair of adjacent levels yields an ordinal observation, the declared direction and the number of cards, modelled through a cumulative-link likelihood that relates the number of blank cards to the latent value difference between alternatives. Two Bayesian inference algorithms are proposed: BAYES-DOR samples the whole posterior distribution by Hamiltonian Monte Carlo; FTRL-DOR tracks the maximum a posteriori estimate by constrained convex optimization. Moreover, through a multi-step elicitation process, elicitation can be spread over several short sessions reducing the cognitive burden on the DM. Both algorithms enjoy logarithmic regret bounds for prediction that hold for any sequence of DM responses and that guide the choice of the prior hyperparameters. A Monte Carlo study over 768 configurations shows that accuracy grows with the number of sessions, that blank cards add significant information over preference directions alone, that both algorithms maintain good performance under inconsistent answers, and that both outperform DOR and SMAA-DOR. An illustrative application to Italian regional healthcare performance demonstrates the practical applicability of the approach for building composite indicators.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2609.23212 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2609.23212v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.23212 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 331 words
Related coverage

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 6, 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026
Sequential Bayesian Evaluation of Large Language Model Behavior
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026
Robust Wavelength Selection for Partial Least Squares Sugar Content Estimation Using Combinatorial Bayesian Optimization
arXiv · Jul 31, 2026