aiqbench analysis
This research applies reinforcement learning to optimize quadrotor flight performance by explicitly modeling battery voltage dynamics during aggressive maneuvers like drone racing. By integrating real-time voltage data into the control policy, the system unlocks unused thrust capacity without sacrificing stability or precision under load. The study demonstrates that accounting for power degradation allows for significant reductions in race times and tracking errors compared to standard controllers.
Battery-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Aggressive Quadrotor Flight
arXiv:2609.37316v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agile flight tasks such as drone racing and pursuit-evasion require strong acceleration and precise turns, but the available thrust changes as the battery discharges and voltage drops under load. Conservative command limits make this variation easier to tolerate, at the cost of unused performance. We investigate how learned controllers can use that additional thrust while retaining the flight controller's voltage compensation and rate control. Our training simulator couples an identified load-transient battery model to rotor dynamics and firmware saturation. The feedforward policy receives filtered voltage during both training and deployment. Controlled ablations distinguish the benefit of a larger thrust-command range from that of voltage information. On a 38 g Crazyflie Brushless, the resulting policy reduces circle tracking error by 49% relative to stock-authority RL at 3.84 m/s, while preserving easy-task precision. Mean 20-lap race time decreases from 106.22 s to 95.24 s. Compared with a voltage-blind policy with the same increased authority, hardware error and race time are lower by 15.3% and 4.5%, respectively. In simulation, replacing the policy's voltage input with a recording from a different battery condition worsens hard-circle tracking, with a smaller, voltage-dependent effect in racing. Together, these results show where a simple voltage input complements existing actuator compensation in aggressive learned flight.
Abstract:Agile flight tasks such as drone racing and pursuit-evasion require strong acceleration and precise turns, but the available thrust changes as the battery discharges and voltage drops under load. Conservative command limits make this variation easier to tolerate, at the cost of unused performance. We investigate how learned controllers can use that additional thrust while retaining the flight controller's voltage compensation and rate control. Our training simulator couples an identified load-transient battery model to rotor dynamics and firmware saturation. The feedforward policy receives filtered voltage during both training and deployment. Controlled ablations distinguish the benefit of a larger thrust-command range from that of voltage information. On a 38 g Crazyflie Brushless, the resulting policy reduces circle tracking error by 49% relative to stock-authority RL at 3.84 m/s, while preserving easy-task precision. Mean 20-lap race time decreases from 106.22 s to 95.24 s. Compared with a voltage-blind policy with the same increased authority, hardware error and race time are lower by 15.3% and 4.5%, respectively. In simulation, replacing the policy's voltage input with a recording from a different battery condition worsens hard-circle tracking, with a smaller, voltage-dependent effect in racing. Together, these results show where a simple voltage input complements existing actuator compensation in aggressive learned flight.
9 pages, 9 figures, 4 tables. Submitted to ICRA 2027. Supplementary video: this https URL
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.37316 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.37316v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.37316 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 314 words
Related coverage
Learning to Fly: Stable Vision-Guided UAV Servoing with Compact Target-Centric Cues and Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · Sep 10, 2026
WAND: Learning Robust Navigation under Complex Wind Disturbances and Dense Obstacles for Quadrotors
arXiv · Oct 9, 2026
Sensor-Layout-Agnostic Navigation via Geometric Observation Canonicalization
arXiv · Oct 7, 2026

Microsoft AI CEO says AI threats are real, and Anthropic is making it worse
The Verge · Sep 17, 2026