Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research proposes a hybrid framework combining traditional Journal Entry Tests with machine learning models to reduce false positives in financial anomaly detection. By leveraging synthetic data, the study aims to enhance audit efficiency and validity, representing a practical application of ML techniques within high-stakes domain-specific workflows.
Sources coveringarXiv, InfoQ, Quantum Zeitgeist
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Anomaly Detection in General Ledger Data: Results from a Hybrid Approach

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.18228v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Journal Entry Tests (JETs) are a mandatory part of annual audits to evaluate and assess both highrisk audit areas and potential material misstatements. However, as JETs are designed to detect known patterns based on domain knowledge, the resulting lists are often very large and require substantial additional effort from the auditor. To ensure the economic efficiency of the audit, the number of false positives in JET result lists must be reduced. Especially machine learning (ML) methods represent a promising approach to improve anomaly detection in this field. In this research in progress paper, we investigate different approaches on how to combine JETs with ML-methods in a hybrid manner. We present specialized models to increase the detection performance and validity of anomaly detection results to improve audit efficiency. The experiments are based on synthetic data consisting of different normal and anomalous journal entries.

Abstract:Journal Entry Tests (JETs) are a mandatory part of annual audits to evaluate and assess both highrisk audit areas and potential material misstatements. However, as JETs are designed to detect known patterns based on domain knowledge, the resulting lists are often very large and require substantial additional effort from the auditor. To ensure the economic efficiency of the audit, the number of false positives in JET result lists must be reduced. Especially machine learning (ML) methods represent a promising approach to improve anomaly detection in this field. In this research in progress paper, we investigate different approaches on how to combine JETs with ML-methods in a hybrid manner. We present specialized models to increase the detection performance and validity of anomaly detection results to improve audit efficiency. The experiments are based on synthetic data consisting of different normal and anomalous journal entries.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.18228 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.18228v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.18228 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 236 words

Related coverage