aiqbench analysis
This study investigates the efficacy of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architectures specifically within South Asian multilingual contexts, aiming to identify high-performing factors for culturally grounded question answering. The research evaluates how retrieval mechanisms impact accuracy compared to non-contexted baselines and determines whether RAG integration offers distinct benefits for specific cultural narratives versus general queries. By extracting these performance drivers, the work provides actionable insights for optimizing hybrid systems in low-resource, linguistically diverse environments.
Analyzing performance of Retrieval Augmented Generation models for Question Answering Tasks
arXiv:2610.20419v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models have become almost a cornerstone of open-domain question answering tasks; in which the quality of answers generated in the process, greatly relies on the effectiveness of retrieval mechanisms. In the realm of LLM, the last two years have seen tremendous progress in RAG architectures, with many models reporting to have improved performance through various design innovations. The cultural question and answering systems of South Asia, in particular, present a specific challenge since the region is home to the vast number of languages and traditions, which are closely interrelated. Along with these deeply intertwined historical narratives increase the need for culturally grounded and context-aware interpretation. Despite major architectural advances in LLMs, claiming significant improvements, challenges remain when answering these region specific questions in native languages. In this study, we aim to extract high-performing factors to guide the development of optimized hybrid RAG systems. We further explore whether the integration of RAG changes performance differently for culturally grounded and non-cultural questions in a South Asian multilingual setup, and whether RAG produces a higher overall percentage of correct answers than contexted answering. We also examine how LLM performance changes when RAG methods are integrated into the question-answering pipeline in comparison with non-contexted and contexted answering and, evaluate whether the introduction of RAG benefits popular or non-popular culturally grounded questions more. Not only does our work evaluate the current methods but also carves a path for future designs of more accurate and efficient question-answering pipelines.
Abstract:Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models have become almost a cornerstone of open-domain question answering tasks; in which the quality of answers generated in the process, greatly relies on the effectiveness of retrieval mechanisms. In the realm of LLM, the last two years have seen tremendous progress in RAG architectures, with many models reporting to have improved performance through various design innovations. The cultural question and answering systems of South Asia, in particular, present a specific challenge since the region is home to the vast number of languages and traditions, which are closely interrelated. Along with these deeply intertwined historical narratives increase the need for culturally grounded and context-aware interpretation. Despite major architectural advances in LLMs, claiming significant improvements, challenges remain when answering these region specific questions in native languages. In this study, we aim to extract high-performing factors to guide the development of optimized hybrid RAG systems. We further explore whether the integration of RAG changes performance differently for culturally grounded and non-cultural questions in a South Asian multilingual setup, and whether RAG produces a higher overall percentage of correct answers than contexted answering. We also examine how LLM performance changes when RAG methods are integrated into the question-answering pipeline in comparison with non-contexted and contexted answering and, evaluate whether the introduction of RAG benefits popular or non-popular culturally grounded questions more. Not only does our work evaluate the current methods but also carves a path for future designs of more accurate and efficient question-answering pipelines.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.20419 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.20419v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20419 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 343 words
Related coverage
From Vector Search to Agentic RAG: Building an Enterprise Research Analyst with hipVS
AMD · Jul 15, 2026

Building trust in AI agents: A production-ready evaluation framework with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Oct 16, 2026
RAGuard: A Layered Defense Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems Against Data Poisoning
arXiv · Jul 30, 2026

Building an Analysis AI Agent for Industrial Alarm Management with NVIDIA Nemotron
NVIDIA · Jul 7, 2026