Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This study applies a pretrained CT foundation model to create an uncertainty-guided digital twin for forecasting anatomical changes during head and neck proton therapy. By predicting daily anatomy before treatment sessions, the framework enables online adaptive planning that matches the clinical quality of traditional offline replanning, effectively reducing high-dose exposure to critical structures like the spinal cord. The work demonstrates a practical integration of generative AI into precision oncology workflows to address the limitations of reactive treatment adjustments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

An Uncertainty-Guided Digital Twin Framework for Online Adaptive Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer: A Feasibility Study

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.39010v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Objective: Head and neck (HN) proton therapy spans six to seven weeks of anatomical change, while offline replanning takes about a week. We present an uncertainty-guided digital twin (UGDT) framework that forecasts treatment-day anatomy before treatment and evaluate whether it generates online adaptive proton therapy (APT) plans of clinical quality. Approach: A library of 302 longitudinal deformations from 88 previously treated HN patients was transported onto each new patient's treatment planning CT (TPCT) using two-step multi-atlas deformable image registration (DIR) built on a pretrained CT foundation model, generating about 284 predicted CTs (pdCTs) with contours per patient. Dispersion of propagated clinical target volume (CTV) contours defined a patient-specific robust margin. In ten patients, the quality assurance CT (QACT) triggering a replan represented treatment-day anatomy, and the physician-approved replan was the baseline. The pdCT most similar to the QACT (pdCT-H) and one from the lowest quartile (pdCT-L) were planned to within about 5% of baseline plan quality, forward-calculated on the QACT, and reoptimized to generate online APT plans. Main results: pdCT plans scored within -0.7% (pdCT-H) and -1.0% (pdCT-L) of baseline. Forward calculation on QACT reduced high-dose CTV D98% to 88.3% and 85.5%. After online reoptimization, D98% recovered to 98.3 +/- 0.3% and 98.2 +/- 0.3%, versus 98.5 +/- 0.4% at baseline. Spinal cord and brainstem doses remained below tolerance, and plan quality scores were within -1.1% (p = 0.19) and -1.7% (p = 0.01) of baseline. Significance: UGDT generated online APT plans comparable in quality to physician-approved offline replans using anatomy forecast before treatment, enabling a transition from reactive offline replanning toward anticipatory online adaptation.

Authors:Yizhou Wu, Ryan J. Sanford, Huiqiao Xie, Jie Ding, Shupeng Chen, Tung-Ho Wu, Ping-Hsiu Wu, Justin Roper, Jun Zhou, Minglei Kang, Bill Stokes, Sibo Tian, David S. Yu, Xiaofeng Yang, Chih-Wei Chang

Abstract:Objective: Head and neck (HN) proton therapy spans six to seven weeks of anatomical change, while offline replanning takes about a week. We present an uncertainty-guided digital twin (UGDT) framework that forecasts treatment-day anatomy before treatment and evaluate whether it generates online adaptive proton therapy (APT) plans of clinical quality. Approach: A library of 302 longitudinal deformations from 88 previously treated HN patients was transported onto each new patient's treatment planning CT (TPCT) using two-step multi-atlas deformable image registration (DIR) built on a pretrained CT foundation model, generating about 284 predicted CTs (pdCTs) with contours per patient. Dispersion of propagated clinical target volume (CTV) contours defined a patient-specific robust margin. In ten patients, the quality assurance CT (QACT) triggering a replan represented treatment-day anatomy, and the physician-approved replan was the baseline. The pdCT most similar to the QACT (pdCT-H) and one from the lowest quartile (pdCT-L) were planned to within about 5% of baseline plan quality, forward-calculated on the QACT, and reoptimized to generate online APT plans. Main results: pdCT plans scored within -0.7% (pdCT-H) and -1.0% (pdCT-L) of baseline. Forward calculation on QACT reduced high-dose CTV D98% to 88.3% and 85.5%. After online reoptimization, D98% recovered to 98.3 +/- 0.3% and 98.2 +/- 0.3%, versus 98.5 +/- 0.4% at baseline. Spinal cord and brainstem doses remained below tolerance, and plan quality scores were within -1.1% (p = 0.19) and -1.7% (p = 0.01) of baseline. Significance: UGDT generated online APT plans comparable in quality to physician-approved offline replans using anatomy forecast before treatment, enabling a transition from reactive offline replanning toward anticipatory online adaptation.

Medical Physics (physics.med-ph); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.39010 [physics.med-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.39010v1 [physics.med-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.39010 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 318 words

Related coverage