Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes a rigorous theoretical framework for automorphism gates, demonstrating how they maximize logical power using only cheap physical single-qubit Clifford operations and qubit permutations. The study reveals a critical trade-off where achieving the largest logical group requires an exponential number of physical qubits ($\Theta(2^k)$), whereas diagonal gates can be implemented with a polynomial cost ($\Theta(k^2)$). These findings are essential for optimizing resource efficiency in universal fault-tolerant quantum computing architectures by identifying the precise boundaries between addressable gate types.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Achieving the limits of automorphism gates

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.19250v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Universal fault-tolerant quantum computing combines versatile but expensive operations with specialized but cheap ones. Its efficiency depends on how much computation can be pushed onto the cheap operations and on the size of the code needed to do so. Automorphism gates provide such cheap operations using only physical single-qubit Clifford gates and qubit permutations. Yet no general theory characterizes their maximum logical power or the minimum code size needed to attain it. We develop such a theory. For stabilizer codes encoding $k\geq3$ logical qubits, we show that the largest logical group attainable by automorphisms is generated by all addressable $S$ and $\mathrm{CX}$ gates, and we construct codes attaining it. While this group contains exponentially fewer gates than the full Clifford group, adding one suitable non-Clifford gate yields universality. We further classify the largest logical groups attainable using qubit permutations, physical single-qubit Cliffords, or both across general stabilizer and CSS codes, and derive refined bounds for self-dual CSS subclasses. Achieving the maximum-size logical group through automorphisms requires $n=\Theta(2^k)$ physical qubits. By contrast, all addressable diagonal Clifford gates, generated by $S$ and $\mathrm{CZ}$, require only $n=\Theta(k^2)$ physical qubits when implemented using physical single-qubit Cliffords alone. Both bounds are tight. This polynomial qubit cost extends beyond Cliffords to all addressable diagonal gates at any fixed level of the Clifford hierarchy, using physical single-qubit diagonal gates. Thus, for full addressability, the sharpest physical-qubit cost divide lies between diagonal and $\mathrm{CX}$-type gates, not between Clifford and non-Clifford gates.

Abstract:Universal fault-tolerant quantum computing combines versatile but expensive operations with specialized but cheap ones. Its efficiency depends on how much computation can be pushed onto the cheap operations and on the size of the code needed to do so. Automorphism gates provide such cheap operations using only physical single-qubit Clifford gates and qubit permutations. Yet no general theory characterizes their maximum logical power or the minimum code size needed to attain it. We develop such a theory. For stabilizer codes encoding $k\geq3$ logical qubits, we show that the largest logical group attainable by automorphisms is generated by all addressable $S$ and $\mathrm{CX}$ gates, and we construct codes attaining it. While this group contains exponentially fewer gates than the full Clifford group, adding one suitable non-Clifford gate yields universality. We further classify the largest logical groups attainable using qubit permutations, physical single-qubit Cliffords, or both across general stabilizer and CSS codes, and derive refined bounds for self-dual CSS subclasses. Achieving the maximum-size logical group through automorphisms requires $n=\Theta(2^k)$ physical qubits. By contrast, all addressable diagonal Clifford gates, generated by $S$ and $\mathrm{CZ}$, require only $n=\Theta(k^2)$ physical qubits when implemented using physical single-qubit Cliffords alone. Both bounds are tight. This polynomial qubit cost extends beyond Cliffords to all addressable diagonal gates at any fixed level of the Clifford hierarchy, using physical single-qubit diagonal gates. Thus, for full addressability, the sharpest physical-qubit cost divide lies between diagonal and $\mathrm{CX}$-type gates, not between Clifford and non-Clifford gates.

arXiv:2609.19250 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.19250v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19250 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 334 words

Related coverage