aiqbench analysis
This paper presents a novel Bayesian framework for adaptive top-$k$ selection, offering a generalizable algorithm that minimizes opportunity cost across various sampling distributions. Theoretical analysis confirms the method achieves an exponential decay rate in posterior expected opportunity cost that is at least half of the optimal achievable rate, with simulations demonstrating competitive or superior performance against existing algorithms.
A Simple and General Approach to top-$k$ Selection
arXiv:2610.26407v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper considers the Bayesian top-$k$ identification problem, wherein a decision maker is tasked with selecting $k$ items from a pool of items of unknown quality. To assess the items, the decision maker adaptively allocates a fixed sampling budget, where each sample of an item yields a noisy observation of its quality, with the objective of minimizing the expected opportunity cost of the selected set. We propose an approach that allocates each batch of samples by minimizing a surrogate objective derived from an upper bound on the expected opportunity cost. The approach is general: samples can be allocated in batches, the selection size $k$ is arbitrary, and it applies to many sampling distributions. It is also simple and intuitive. We prove that the method's posterior expected opportunity cost decays at an exponential rate of at least half the best rate achievable by any sampling rule. In simulations across a wide range of settings, the method is competitive with, and often improves upon, the best existing algorithm in each setting.
Abstract:This paper considers the Bayesian top-$k$ identification problem, wherein a decision maker is tasked with selecting $k$ items from a pool of items of unknown quality. To assess the items, the decision maker adaptively allocates a fixed sampling budget, where each sample of an item yields a noisy observation of its quality, with the objective of minimizing the expected opportunity cost of the selected set. We propose an approach that allocates each batch of samples by minimizing a surrogate objective derived from an upper bound on the expected opportunity cost. The approach is general: samples can be allocated in batches, the selection size $k$ is arbitrary, and it applies to many sampling distributions. It is also simple and intuitive. We prove that the method's posterior expected opportunity cost decays at an exponential rate of at least half the best rate achievable by any sampling rule. In simulations across a wide range of settings, the method is competitive with, and often improves upon, the best existing algorithm in each setting.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2610.26407 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.26407v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.26407 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 264 words
Related coverage
Investigation of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Diagnosis Using Machine Learning Approaches
arXiv · Jul 21, 2026
Whispering Wisely: Smart Subset Selection for ASR Fine-Tuning
arXiv · Oct 27, 2026
Pack and Extract: An Effective Graph-Based Approach for Feature Selection
arXiv · Oct 21, 2026
Causal Discovery Under Hard Selection Bias: A New Robust Score-Matching Approach
arXiv · Oct 14, 2026