aiqbench analysis
This paper establishes a rigorous quantitative framework for benchmarking classical heuristics against the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm on NP-hard logistics problems like TSP. By providing an open-source implementation across varying graph sizes, it offers critical insights into scalability and solution quality that are essential for evaluating near-term quantum advantage in operations research. The work directly addresses core challenges at the intersection of computational complexity and emerging quantum algorithms.
A Quantitative Framework for Comparing Classical and Quantum Algorithms for the Traveling Salesman Problem
arXiv:2607.24581v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Traveling Salesman Problem is a classical NP-hard problem with significant implications in logistics, circuit design, and operations research. This paper presents a comparative study of four approaches to solving the Traveling Salesman Problem: brute-force enumeration, a 2-approximation algorithm using minimum spanning trees, simulated annealing, and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. We implement each technique and evaluate them on graphs of varying sizes to analyze performance, solution quality, and scalability. In doing so, we have also developed an open-source framework that allows researchers and practitioners to explore, test and extend these methods.
Abstract:The Traveling Salesman Problem is a classical NP-hard problem with significant implications in logistics, circuit design, and operations research. This paper presents a comparative study of four approaches to solving the Traveling Salesman Problem: brute-force enumeration, a 2-approximation algorithm using minimum spanning trees, simulated annealing, and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. We implement each technique and evaluate them on graphs of varying sizes to analyze performance, solution quality, and scalability. In doing so, we have also developed an open-source framework that allows researchers and practitioners to explore, test and extend these methods.
Presented at PEARC'26: "Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing", July 26-30, 2026. Minneapolis, MN, USA
Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
arXiv:2607.24581 [cs.CC]
(or arXiv:2607.24581v1 [cs.CC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.24581 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
https://doi.org/10.1145/3785462.3815790 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 218 words
Related coverage

2-Approximation Algorithm Rivals Quantum Traveling Salesman Problem Performance
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 30, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026
Quantum Approximate Multi-Objective Optimization in Routing Problems
arXiv · Oct 2, 2026

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · Aug 4, 2026