Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research applies lexical analysis to over 55,000 user reviews to identify specific friction points and concerns in human-AI interactions, aiming to inform the design of more user-centric systems. By mapping these qualitative insights through factor analysis, the study bridges a gap between abstract ethical considerations and concrete usability challenges faced by real-world users. The findings offer actionable data for refining AI deployment strategies and improving overall system trustworthiness without relying on generic sentiment scores alone.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A Lexical Analysis of online Reviews on Human-AI Interactions

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2511.13480v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This study focuses on understanding the complex dynamics between humans and AI systems by analyzing user reviews. While previous research has explored various aspects of human-AI interaction, such as user perceptions and ethical considerations, there remains a gap in understanding the specific concerns and challenges users face. By using a lexical approach to analyze 55,968 online reviews from G2.com, Producthunt.com, and Trustpilot.com, this preliminary research aims to analyze human-AI interaction. Initial results from factor analysis reveal key factors influencing these interactions. The study aims to provide deeper insights into these factors through content analysis, contributing to the development of more user-centric AI systems. The findings are expected to enhance our understanding of human-AI interaction and inform future AI technology and user experience improvements.

Abstract:This study focuses on understanding the complex dynamics between humans and AI systems by analyzing user reviews. While previous research has explored various aspects of human-AI interaction, such as user perceptions and ethical considerations, there remains a gap in understanding the specific concerns and challenges users face. By using a lexical approach to analyze 55,968 online reviews from this http URL, this http URL, and this http URL, this preliminary research aims to analyze human-AI interaction. Initial results from factor analysis reveal key factors influencing these interactions. The study aims to provide deeper insights into these factors through content analysis, contributing to the development of more user-centric AI systems. The findings are expected to enhance our understanding of human-AI interaction and inform future AI technology and user experience improvements.

Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2511.13480 [cs.HC]

(or arXiv:2511.13480v2 [cs.HC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.13480 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Human Factors in Design, Engineering, and Computing, Vol. 159, pp. 558-568, 2024

https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1005622 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 246 words

Related coverage