analiza aiqbench
This research applies lexical analysis to over 55,000 user reviews to identify specific friction points and concerns in human-AI interactions, aiming to inform the design of more user-centric systems. By mapping these qualitative insights through factor analysis, the study bridges a gap between abstract ethical considerations and concrete usability challenges faced by real-world users. The findings offer actionable data for refining AI deployment strategies and improving overall system trustworthiness without relying on generic sentiment scores alone.
A Lexical Analysis of online Reviews on Human-AI Interactions
arXiv:2511.13480v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This study focuses on understanding the complex dynamics between humans and AI systems by analyzing user reviews. While previous research has explored various aspects of human-AI interaction, such as user perceptions and ethical considerations, there remains a gap in understanding the specific concerns and challenges users face. By using a lexical approach to analyze 55,968 online reviews from G2.com, Producthunt.com, and Trustpilot.com, this preliminary research aims to analyze human-AI interaction. Initial results from factor analysis reveal key factors influencing these interactions. The study aims to provide deeper insights into these factors through content analysis, contributing to the development of more user-centric AI systems. The findings are expected to enhance our understanding of human-AI interaction and inform future AI technology and user experience improvements.
Abstract:This study focuses on understanding the complex dynamics between humans and AI systems by analyzing user reviews. While previous research has explored various aspects of human-AI interaction, such as user perceptions and ethical considerations, there remains a gap in understanding the specific concerns and challenges users face. By using a lexical approach to analyze 55,968 online reviews from this http URL, this http URL, and this http URL, this preliminary research aims to analyze human-AI interaction. Initial results from factor analysis reveal key factors influencing these interactions. The study aims to provide deeper insights into these factors through content analysis, contributing to the development of more user-centric AI systems. The findings are expected to enhance our understanding of human-AI interaction and inform future AI technology and user experience improvements.
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2511.13480 [cs.HC]
(or arXiv:2511.13480v2 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.13480 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Human Factors in Design, Engineering, and Computing, Vol. 159, pp. 558-568, 2024
https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1005622 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 246 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · 15 iun. 2026
Models Can't Remember Their Training. Neither Can You.
LessWrong · 19 iul. 2026

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · 26 aug. 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026