aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces a general framework for dynamic submodular maximization that achieves the first constant-factor approximations with sublinear consistency in fully dynamic settings involving both insertions and deletions. By providing specific bounds for cardinality and matroid constraints, the work advances the theoretical limits of maintaining near-optimal solutions with minimal adjustment costs. The results are particularly relevant for algorithm designers working on streaming data problems where solution stability is critical.
A General Framework for Dynamic Consistent Submodular Maximization
arXiv:2606.04946v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Consistency is an important property in dynamic submodular maximization and entails maintaining a near-optimal solution at all times, making only a small number of adjustments to the solution in each step. Prior work has explored this question for the insertion-only case, where the algorithm faces a stream of $n$ insertions, and has established lower and upper bounds for the cardinality-constrained version of the problem. We consider this question in the fully dynamic setting, where the stream of operations may contain both insertions and deletions. We develop a general framework for designing algorithms for this setting, and instantiate it to obtain the first constant-factor approximations with sublinear consistency. For cardinality constraints, we propose a $\frac 12 - O(\varepsilon)$ approximation that is $O\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}\right)$ consistent. For rank-$k$ matroid constraints, we construct a $\frac 14 - O(\varepsilon)$ approximation to the dynamic optimum that is $O\left(\frac{\log k}{\varepsilon^2}\right)$ consistent.
Abstract:Consistency is an important property in dynamic submodular maximization and entails maintaining a near-optimal solution at all times, making only a small number of adjustments to the solution in each step. Prior work has explored this question for the insertion-only case, where the algorithm faces a stream of $n$ insertions, and has established lower and upper bounds for the cardinality-constrained version of the problem. We consider this question in the fully dynamic setting, where the stream of operations may contain both insertions and deletions. We develop a general framework for designing algorithms for this setting, and instantiate it to obtain the first constant-factor approximations with sublinear consistency. For cardinality constraints, we propose a $\frac 12 - O(\varepsilon)$ approximation that is $O\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}\right)$ consistent. For rank-$k$ matroid constraints, we construct a $\frac 14 - O(\varepsilon)$ approximation to the dynamic optimum that is $O\left(\frac{\log k}{\varepsilon^2}\right)$ consistent.
Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2606.04946 [cs.DS]
(or arXiv:2606.04946v1 [cs.DS] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04946 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 245 words
Related coverage

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Social Theory and Agent Foundations
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026
C$^2$MOE: Consistency and Complementarity-guided Mixture of Experts for Incomplete Multimodal Emotion Learning
arXiv · Aug 6, 2026
From Linear to Linearizable Optimization: A Novel Framework with Applications to Stationary and Non-stationary DR-submodular Optimization
arXiv · Sep 15, 2026