Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
A conceptual framework for ideology in online discourse beyond the left and right
arXiv:2603.18945v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Computational social science (CSS) has largely operationalized ideology along a single left/right partisan axis when studying online discourse. This approach obscures how people interpret and engage with more specific ideological formations related to race, climate, gender, and other domains. We introduce a framework that instead conceptualizes ideology as a multi-level socio-cognitive concept network and then explain how this conceptual model of ideology can be linked to the study of online discourse. In doing so, our framework clarifies how ideology manifests in discourse alongside related social processes such as framing, and provides an argument for better understanding of when and why we might study multiple concepts, such as values and beliefs, together in one analysis. More broadly, it bridges methods used to study online discourse with ideology theory, enabling richer analyses of social discourse that benefit both fields. Although primarily theoretical, we provide a concrete operationalization of the framework on a sample of data, allowing us to show one example of how it can be used on real data.
Abstract:Computational social science (CSS) has largely operationalized ideology along a single left/right partisan axis when studying online discourse. This approach obscures how people interpret and engage with more specific ideological formations related to race, climate, gender, and other domains. We introduce a framework that instead conceptualizes ideology as a multi-level socio-cognitive concept network and then explain how this conceptual model of ideology can be linked to the study of online discourse. In doing so, our framework clarifies how ideology manifests in discourse alongside related social processes such as framing, and provides an argument for better understanding of when and why we might study multiple concepts, such as values and beliefs, together in one analysis. More broadly, it bridges methods used to study online discourse with ideology theory, enabling richer analyses of social discourse that benefit both fields. Although primarily theoretical, we provide a concrete operationalization of the framework on a sample of data, allowing us to show one example of how it can be used on real data.
Computers and Society (cs.CY); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2603.18945 [cs.CY]
(or arXiv:2603.18945v2 [cs.CY] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.18945 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 265 words
Related coverage

Academia is for Ambition — Alex Zhang, MIT
Latent Space · Oct 2, 2026
Assessing Information Ecosystems : How Governments Can Get Ahead of Hybrid Threats
carnegieendowment.org · Aug 5, 2026

Presentation: From Fab To Token - The State Of The Market
InfoQ · Aug 18, 2026
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026