Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research validates the application of diachronic word embeddings for tracking semantic drift in low-resource, ancient languages like Sanskrit, overcoming unique linguistic barriers such as sandhi and morphological inflection. By successfully aligning computational trajectory with philological evidence across four historical periods, the study demonstrates that modern NLP paradigms can be effectively adapted for classical text analysis.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, AI Alignment Forum

A Computational Approach to Measuring Semantic Change in Sanskrit Literature

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.25012v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diachronic word embeddings have become the modern standard for tracking semantic change, yet they have been largely validated on modern, high-resource, and well-segmented languages. This paper tests whether the paradigm transfers to Sanskrit, an ancient, low-resource language whose phonological fusion (sandhi), morphological inflection, compounding, and polysemy pose a unique challenge. I assemble a 2.7M-token corpus spanning four canonical periods, recover word boundaries with a neural byte-level sandhi splitter and lemmatizer, and train per-period embeddings across configurations. To evaluate the system, I curate a validation set from historical scholarship and test recovery directionally with anchor displacement. Of 21 testable shifts, 19 move in the philologically attested direction (sign test, p=0.00011). I further show which configuration the language forces and comment on opportunities for improvement.

Abstract:Diachronic word embeddings have become the modern standard for tracking semantic change, yet they have been largely validated on modern, high-resource, and well-segmented languages. This paper tests whether the paradigm transfers to Sanskrit, an ancient, low-resource language whose phonological fusion (sandhi), morphological inflection, compounding, and polysemy pose a unique challenge. I assemble a 2.7M-token corpus spanning four canonical periods, recover word boundaries with a neural byte-level sandhi splitter and lemmatizer, and train per-period embeddings across configurations. To evaluate the system, I curate a validation set from historical scholarship and test recovery directionally with anchor displacement. Of 21 testable shifts, 19 move in the philologically attested direction (sign test, p=0.00011). I further show which configuration the language forces and comment on opportunities for improvement.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2609.25012 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.25012v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.25012 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 216 words

Related coverage