Stepfun · model passport
StepFun: Step 5 Preview
step-5-preview- Open weights
- Proprietary licence
- 604.3B params
- 1,048,576 context
- Released 2026-09-20(HF repo created)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,447#74 of 396
- Best percentile
- 85.7Coding
- Cohort standing
- 66.2median 60.3
What the data says
Benchmarked on 8 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Strongest axes
- 85.7 pct — Coding (1,508)
Uneven: 47.5 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 85.7 pct on Coding versus 38.2 pct on Agent Arena.
- Coding85.7 pct1,508Verify →
- Hard prompts84.1 pct1,475Verify →
- Instruction following82.6 pct1,441Verify →
- Overall81.6 pct1,447Verify →
- WebDev Arena77 pct1,565Verify →
- Vision Arena69.3 pct1,250Verify →
- Factuality Arena59.9 pct1,446Verify →
- Agent Arena38.2 pct-0.014Verify →
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "stepfun-ai/Step-5-Preview"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Use it hosted
stepfun/step-5-previewAPI parameters this endpoint supports
Example request
curl https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"stepfun/step-5-preview","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello"}]}'Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
Step 5 Preview stands at 66.2 (raw mean 72.3) — measured on 8 of 27 axes.
Step 5 Preview stands at 66.2 versus a cohort median of 60.3 across 176 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
Step 5 Preview scores at percentile 85.7 on Coding.
Step 5 Preview ranks between #37 and #159 across 6 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →