Alibaba · model passport
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
qwen3-30b-a3b-thinking-2507- Open weights
- 30.5B params
- 81,920 context
- Released 2025-07-01(from model name)
- Best percentile
- 51.6GPQA Diamond
- Cohort standing
- 50.4median 51.6
Thin coverage — read with caution
This model appears on only 2 of 27 benchmark axes considered. The overall standing has been shrunk toward the neutral 50 to reflect the small sample, and no weaknesses have been claimed — a low percentile on 2 axes is a coverage artifact, not a measured weakness.
What the data says
Benchmarked on 2 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
On only 2 board(s), a ranked list of strengths would be false authority — the per-axis figures are shown below instead, without a verdict.
Uneven: 1.1 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 51.6 pct on GPQA Diamond versus 50.5 pct on AIME (math).
- GPQA Diamond51.6 pct70.1%Verify →
- AIME (math)50.5 pct70.3%Verify →
- OverallNot benchmarked
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
- CodingNot benchmarked
- Instruction followingNot benchmarked
- Hard promptsNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "Qwen/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Use it hosted
qwen/qwen3-30b-a3b-thinking-2507API parameters this endpoint supports
Example request
curl https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"qwen/qwen3-30b-a3b-thinking-2507","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello"}]}'Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
qwen3-30b-a3b-thinking-2507 stands at 50.4 (raw mean 51) — measured on only 2 of 27 axes, so the standing is shrunk toward the neutral 50.
qwen3-30b-a3b-thinking-2507 stands at 50.4 versus a cohort median of 51.6 across 144 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
qwen3-30b-a3b-thinking-2507 ranks between #210 and #400 across 3 built-in weightings — best under "Reasoning", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →