Skip to content

Mistral · model passport

Magistral Medium 2506

magistral-medium-2506
  • Cloud only
  • Proprietary licence
  • Released 2025-06-01(from model name)
5/27axes covered
Overall · LMArena
1,305#261 of 395
Best percentile
47.7Coding
Cohort standing
40.5median 50.8

What the data says

Benchmarked on 5 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.

Weakest axes

  • 11 pct — ARC-AGI-2 (0.0%)

Uneven: 36.7 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 47.7 pct on Coding versus 11 pct on ARC-AGI-2.

  • Coding47.7 pct1,387Verify →
  • Hard prompts42 pct1,333Verify →
  • Instruction following39.2 pct1,301Verify →
  • Overall34.2 pct1,305Verify →
  • ARC-AGI-211 pct0.0%Verify →
  • WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Search ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Document ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
  • GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
  • AIME (math)Not benchmarked
  • FrontierMathNot benchmarked
  • SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
  • SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
  • LiveBenchNot benchmarked
  • BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
  • MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
  • LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
  • IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
  • HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked

Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.

  • The magistral-medium-2506 model from mistral covers 5 of 27 axes with a composite shrinkage of 40.5 and a raw composite score of 34.8, without thin coverage.

    standingVerify →
  • The magistral-medium-2506 model from mistral has a standing of 40.5, which is below the cohort median standing of 50.8 across 142 models in an 180-day window.

Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →