Zai · model passport

GLM 4 Plus

glm-4-plus

Cloud only
Proprietary licence
Released 2026-10-15(first seen on LMArena)

Overall · LMArena: 1,319#242 of 396
Best percentile: 39.1Overall
Cohort standing: 43.0median 60.8

What the data says

Benchmarked on 4 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.

Uneven: 2.8 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 39.1 pct on Overall versus 36.3 pct on Coding.

Overall39.1 pct1,319Verify →
Instruction following38.9 pct1,301Verify →
Hard prompts36.9 pct1,319Verify →
Coding36.3 pct1,352Verify →
WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
Search ArenaNot benchmarked
Document ArenaNot benchmarked
Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
AIME (math)Not benchmarked
FrontierMathNot benchmarked
SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
LiveBenchNot benchmarked
BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked

Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.

glm-4-plus stands at 43 (raw mean 37.8) — measured on 4 of 27 axes.
standingtemplateVerify →
glm-4-plus stands at 43 versus a cohort median of 60.8 across 168 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
cohorttemplateVerify →

Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →