Google · model passport
Gemini 2 5 Flash Lite Preview 06 17 Thinking
gemini-2-5-flash-lite-preview-06-17-thinking- Cloud only
- Proprietary licence
- Released 2026-01-09(first seen on LMArena)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,375#178 of 396
- Best percentile
- 56.8Instruction following
- Cohort standing
- 50.3median 55.5
What the data says
Benchmarked on 5 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 14.8 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 56.8 pct on Instruction following versus 42 pct on Vision Arena.
- Instruction following56.8 pct1,369Verify →
- Overall55.3 pct1,375Verify →
- Hard prompts53.3 pct1,382Verify →
- Coding45.3 pct1,382Verify →
- Vision Arena42 pct1,188Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
gemini-2.5-flash-lite-preview-06-17-thinking stands at 50.3 (raw mean 50.5) — measured on 5 of 27 axes.
gemini-2.5-flash-lite-preview-06-17-thinking stands at 50.3 versus a cohort median of 55.5 across 115 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
gemini-2.5-flash-lite-preview-06-17-thinking ranks between #159 and #427 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Conversation-first", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →