DeepSeek · model passport
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
deepseek-v4-pro- Open weights
- MIT licence
- 1.65T params
- 1,048,576 context
- Released 2026-08-13(from model name)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,465#49 of 396
- Best percentile
- 88.9Instruction following
- Cohort standing
- 72.0median 59.8
What the data says
Benchmarked on 13 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Strongest axes
- 88.9 pct — Instruction following (1,461)
- 87.9 pct — Overall (1,465)
- 86.6 pct — Hard prompts (1,483)
Uneven: 43.4 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 88.9 pct on Instruction following versus 45.5 pct on Agent Arena.
- Instruction following88.9 pct1,461Verify →
- Overall87.9 pct1,465Verify →
- Hard prompts86.6 pct1,483Verify →
- GPQA Diamond86.4 pct90.9%Verify →
- LiveBench85.9 pct71.6%Verify →
- Coding84.7 pct1,505Verify →
- SWE-bench Verified84.4 pct77.6%Verify →
- AIME (math)83.5 pct96.7%Verify →
- WebDev Arena79.1 pct1,582Verify →
- Factuality Arena70.9 pct1,455Verify →
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)59 pct91.4%Verify →
- SimpleQA Verified58.5 pct47.0%Verify →
- Agent Arena45.5 pct0.004Verify →
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Use it hosted
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813API parameters this endpoint supports
Example request
curl https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello"}]}'Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
deepseek-v4-pro-high-20260813 stands at 72 (raw mean 77) — measured on 13 of 27 axes.
deepseek-v4-pro-high-20260813 stands at 72 versus a cohort median of 59.8 across 188 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
deepseek-v4-pro-high-20260813 scores at percentile 88.9 on Instruction following.
deepseek-v4-pro-high-20260813 scores at percentile 87.9 on Overall.
deepseek-v4-pro-high-20260813 ranks between #17 and #54 across 6 built-in weightings — best under "All-rounder", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →