DeepSeek · model passport
DeepSeek V3 0324
deepseek-v3-0324- Open weights
- MIT licence
- 684.5B params
- Released 2025-03-24(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,395#154 of 396
- Best percentile
- 77.9MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)
- Cohort standing
- 52.0median 46.5
What the data says
Benchmarked on 11 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 57.2 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 77.9 pct on MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis) versus 20.7 pct on SimpleBench.
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)77.9 pct81.9%Verify →
- LiveBench67.7 pct62.8%Verify →
- Overall61.4 pct1,395Verify →
- Instruction following59.1 pct1,378Verify →
- Hard prompts58.8 pct1,408Verify →
- Coding56.3 pct1,428Verify →
- GPQA Diamond49.8 pct67.6%Verify →
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)49.6 pct40.5%Verify →
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)42.3 pct41.0%Verify →
- AIME (math)35 pct37.8%Verify →
- SimpleBench20.7 pct27.2%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3-0324"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
deepseek-v3-0324 stands at 52 (raw mean 52.6) — measured on 11 of 27 axes.
deepseek-v3-0324 stands at 52 versus a cohort median of 46.5 across 151 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
deepseek-v3-0324 ranks between #137 and #401 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →