whitepaper-audit
From the author
Audit a white paper or long-form technical document against a research-grounded best-practices checklist. Two lanes — deterministic script checks (readability, undefined acronyms, structure blocks, broken links) plus an LLM-judge review (overclaims, inconsistent numbers, buried lede, limitations honesty, audience fit). Produces a prioritized P0–P2 findings report by default; applies fixes on explicit request (TDD for any code changes). Use when the user says "audit this white paper", "review my paper against best practices", "check this doc for overclaims", "whitepaper QA", "is this paper ready to publish", or wants prioritized recommendations on a technical document.
Install
npx skills add glebis/claude-skills --skill whitepaper-audit -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/whitepaper-audit/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
- Ships scripts we have not reviewedLow
Why 80
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- doc-quality-reviewNickCrew/Claude-CortexAssess documentation quality across readability, consistency, audience fit, and prose clarity. Produces a scored review with actionable findings. This skill should be used before releases, during doc reviews, or when documentation feels unclear or inconsistent.Engineering★ 62
- paper-review-litescdenney/open-science-skillsProvides a pre-submission manuscript audit covering argument, numerical consistency, references and DOIs, writing, figures, CONSORT flow, pre-registration, and the replication archive. Use before paper submission or when a draft needs an adversarial, quote-grounded review with a journal-readiness checklist. Add `--codex` to run the specification independently on Claude and Codex, GPT-6 Astra, and cross-check findings.Science★ 69
- verify-claimsShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skillsAudit load-bearing paper claims against evidence in results, tables, figures, experiments, or citations. Use for claim audits, overclaiming checks, first or state-of-the-art claims, significant-result wording, prose-table number mismatches, and camera-ready or rebuttal evidence checks.Science★ 58
- kb-auditmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsAudit a knowledge base / help center for coverage, accuracy, and findability. Use when asked to audit a help center, review KB health, find documentation gaps, reduce ticket volume with better docs, or prioritise what to write/fix. Produces an audit — a health scorecard, content gaps (driven by top ticket drivers), stale/duplicate/low-findability articles, and a prioritised fix-and-create backlog.Writing★ 1.5K
- docs-auditorInfrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skillsAudits any developer documentation site across 33 checks in 7 categories and produces a scored report (out of 100) with Pass / Warn / Fail status per check. Use this skill whenever a user provides a docs URL and asks to audit it, review it, score it, check its quality, or evaluate it for AI discoverability, SEO, structure, content, or completeness. Also trigger when the user says "run a docs audit", "audit these docs", "check this documentation", "how good are the docs for X", or pastes a docs URL with any evaluative intent. Always use this skill — do not attempt a freeform docs review without following this structured workflow.Marketing★ 150
- guide-audittonone-ai/tononeAudit existing API documentation for completeness, accuracy, and developer experience. Use when asked to "audit our API docs", "are our docs accurate", or "review documentation quality".Engineering★ 77
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in