engineering-code-review
From the author
Use when reviewing code, pull requests, patches, CLs, diffs, or proposed implementations for engineering quality, code health, design, functionality, tests, maintainability, specialist risk, or approval risk. TRIGGER on "review this PR", "code review", "LGTM?", "approve?", "is this code/diff/change safe to merge/deploy?", and local diff reviews. DO NOT TRIGGER for PR descriptions, PR splitting, author review-feedback responses, or non-code safety questions unless code review is requested.
Install
npx skills add MiniMax-AI/mcode-stack --skill engineering-code-review -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/engineering-code-review/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 86
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- code-reviewanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsReview code changes for security, performance, and correctness. Trigger with a PR URL or diff, "review this before I merge", "is this code safe?", or when checking a change for N+1 queries, injection risks, missing edge cases, or error handling gaps.OfficialEngineering★ 34K
- engineering-review-commentsMiniMax-AI/mcode-stackUse when drafting, rewriting, classifying, or improving code review comments as a reviewer. TRIGGER on rough review notes, requests to make comments clearer or kinder, severity labels, "how should I phrase this review comment?", "write review comments", author pushback, or turning findings into PR comments. If role is unclear, ask reviewer or author. DO NOT TRIGGER for full code review, PR descriptions, or author responses unless wording is requested.Engineering★ 448
- engineering-review-feedbackMiniMax-AI/mcode-stackUse when handling code review feedback as the change author, addressing reviewer comments, drafting replies, resolving disagreements, or summarizing updates. TRIGGER on "address review feedback", "respond to this review comment", "reviewer asked", "I disagree with reviewer", "what should I reply?", or "apply PR comments". If role is unclear, ask reviewer or author. DO NOT TRIGGER for reviewer comment writing, full code review, or PR descriptions unless author-response behavior is requested.Engineering★ 448
- engineering-change-descriptionsMiniMax-AI/mcode-stackUse when writing, rewriting, or reviewing PR/CL descriptions, commit messages, or code-change summaries that explain what changed and why. TRIGGER on "write PR description", "improve this commit message", "summarize this diff", "CL description", "change description", or "make this PR/CL description easier to review". DO NOT TRIGGER for code review, PR splitting, code restructuring, user-facing changelogs, or reviewer replies unless the requested output is a change description.Writing★ 448
- pr-review-expertalirezarezvani/claude-skillsUse when the user asks to review pull requests, analyze code changes, check for security issues in PRs, or assess code quality of diffs.Engineering★ 29K
- engineering-small-prsMiniMax-AI/mcode-stackUse when planning, splitting, shrinking, or sequencing large features, refactors, migrations, or pull requests into small reviewable PRs or CLs. TRIGGER on "split this PR", "this diff is too large", "stacked PRs", "change sequence", "reviewable chunks", "migration plan", "how should I break this up?", or implementation scope too broad for one review. DO NOT TRIGGER for full code review, PR description writing, or tiny one-file edits that already form one self-contained change.Writing★ 448
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in