unslop-tests
From the author
Cuts AI tells from test code: tests that pass without proving anything, tautological assertions, mock-only tests, hardcoded waits, coverage theater, vague names, swallowed errors, retries used as fixes. Use whenever test code is written, changed, or reviewed, including tests produced as a side effect of a feature task, and when the request mentions "review these tests", "are these tests any good", "this test always passes", "this suite is flaky", or "clean up these tests". Must always apply to test code.
Install
npx skills add jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers --skill unslop-tests -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/unslop-tests/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 81
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- unslop-answersjaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testersCuts AI tells from what the agent says about its own work: completion claimed without a run, invented file paths and API names, terminal output that was never produced, findings with no location, percentages with no denominator, absence claimed from one grep, effort narration instead of results, hedge stacking, buried blockers, puffery in a bug title. Use whenever reporting a result, a fix, a review finding, a test outcome, a coverage or flake number, a root cause, or a release recommendation, and when the request mentions "prove it", "did you actually run it", "be specific", "no fluff", "stop hedging", or "is this real". Must always apply to answers about your own work.Testing★ 118
- testing-anti-patternsrohitg00/skillkitReviews test code to identify and fix common testing anti-patterns including flaky tests, over-mocking, brittle assertions, test interdependency, and hidden test logic. Flags bad patterns, explains the specific defect, and provides corrected implementations. Use when reviewing test code, debugging intermittent or unreliable test failures, or when the user mentions flaky tests, test smells, brittle tests, test isolation issues, mock overuse, slow tests, or test maintenance problems.Testing★ 1.6K
- review-testingposit-dev/skillsReview test code for quality, design, and completeness after implementing a feature or fixing a bug. Use when the user asks to "review my tests", "check my test quality", "are these tests good enough", "review testing", or after completing a feature implementation that includes tests. Also use when tests feel brittle, flaky, or superficial. Cross-references production code to find coverage gaps.Testing★ 552
- testhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsWrite or assess tests that prove behavior and would fail without the fix. Use when: writing tests, TDD, or asked whether a green test is enough.Testing★ 1.5K
- Testing CodeMicrock/ordinary-claude-skillsWrite automated tests for features, validate functionality against acceptance criteria, and ensure code coverage. Use when writing test code, verifying functionality, or adding test coverage to existing code.Testing★ 408
- unslopmichaelshimeles/rstackCut AI tells from text you write or edit for a human reader (commit messages, PR titles and bodies, docs, code comments, replies). Apply before committing, posting, or sending; leave prose you didn't touch alone.Writing★ 1.4K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in