science-statistics-choice
From the author
Use when you have data and must decide which test to run — when someone asks "该用什么检验", when a reviewer says the analysis does not match the design, when assumptions are violated and you need the honest fallback instead of the convenient one, when the effect size or correction method is missing from the results, or when a p-value is being asked to carry a claim it cannot carry; also use before data collection to size the study, and when interpreting a result that is significant but tiny.
Install
npx skills add yzlin286-wq/Deepscient --skill science-statistics-choice -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/science-statistics-choice/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 83
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- science-stats-reportyzlin286-wq/DeepscientUse when a statistical result has to leave the analysis tool and enter a manuscript — when writing the statistics paragraph, the table notes, or the figure caption that carries a p-value; when someone asks how to report a test, an effect size, or a confidence interval; when a result is significant but the assumption check failed; when a chi-square had Yates correction or not and the value differs between tools; also use when a reviewer asks for the numbers behind a claim.Science★ 92
- designing-the-analysisK-Dense-AI/science-superpowersUse when you have an approved research question and need a concrete analysis plan, before touching outcome data or fitting any modelScience★ 363
- science-discipline-methodsyzlin286-wq/DeepscientUse when a research question is still a question rather than a plan — when you know the field but not which study design the field accepts, how many samples it demands, which measurements count as evidence, or which software is standard; also use when a review came back saying the design cannot answer the question, when you are switching fields or advising a student in an unfamiliar one, when two supervisors disagree about method, or when you need to know what reviewers in that field attack first before you commit months to a protocol.Science★ 92
- experiment-designeralirezarezvani/claude-skillsUse when planning product experiments, writing testable hypotheses, estimating sample size, prioritizing tests, or interpreting A/B outcomes with practical statistical rigor.Testing★ 28.7K
- science-reporting-standardsyzlin286-wq/DeepscientUse when preparing a submission, when a reviewer asks for CONSORT/PRISMA/STROBE/ARRIVE/TRIPOD items, when the journal demands data/code availability statements, or when an audit reports blocking findings; covers which standard applies to which design and what each one actually requires.Science★ 92
- test-strategynahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcherDecide what to test and at which level before any tests get written — enumerate failure modes by consequence, give each one the cheapest level that can actually observe it, and name what is deliberately left uncovered. Use when starting testing on a feature or a codebase, when asked for a test plan or why coverage sits where it does, or when a suite is large and still missing bugs. Not for writing the tests themselves, and not for proving a finished change works.Testing★ 59
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in