write-rebuttal
From the author
Drafts peer-review rebuttals and author responses in the three real venue formats - (a) strict one-page LaTeX rebuttal PDFs (CVPR-style), (b) OpenReview threaded per-review replies under 10,000-character budgets (NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR), and (c) revise-and-resubmit packages with a change-log response document (CHI, SIGMOD/ICDE revision rounds, journals). Anchors every response to paper sections, tables, figures, and line numbers; enforces character/page budgets and point-by-point coverage with bundled checker scripts; ships a one-page rebuttal LaTeX template. Use when the user says "write my rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "author response", "reviews came back", "reviewer 2 says", "revise and resubmit", "response letter", "rebuttal deadline", or needs to fit a response into an OpenReview character limit or a one-page PDF. Drafts files on disk only; never posts, uploads, or submits.
Install
npx skills add ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills --skill write-rebuttal -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/write-rebuttal/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
- Ships scripts we have not reviewedLow
Why 76
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- rebuttal-and-response-to-reviewersKalarisLabs/research-agent-skillsPlan and write responses to peer review, including journal "response to reviewers" letters for revise-and-resubmit, conference rebuttals under strict length limits (OpenReview/ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML, ACL ARR, CVPR), author responses to meta-reviews, and appeals. Use when a user receives reviews, must triage reviewer comments, draft point-by-point replies, decide what new experiments to run, disagree respectfully with a reviewer, or track manuscript changes for a revision. For authors answering reviews of their own manuscript; to write a review of someone else's paper, use peer-review instead.Science★ 61
- rebuttalwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepWorkflow 4: Submission rebuttal pipeline. Parses external reviews, enforces coverage and grounding, drafts a safe text-only rebuttal under venue limits, and manages follow-up rounds. Use when user says "rebuttal", "reply to reviewers", "ICML rebuttal", "OpenReview response", or wants to answer external reviews safely.Productivity★ 18K
- comment-repliesChenxingJi-Innovate/Cheatcode_Draft replies to open comments on a spec, PRD or design doc (Confluence, Notion, Google Docs, or pasted) and to coworker questions, grounded in the document itself, linked decisions and prior threads, and staged for the author's approval. Classifies each comment (question, objection, suggestion, decision needed, out of scope), drafts a reply in the author's voice, proposes doc edits where the comment is right, and lists the comments only the author can answer. Use when a doc has accumulated review comments or a queue of questions needs answering.Design★ 81
- nature-responseYuan1z0825/nature-skillsDraft, audit, or revise responses to peer review, revision cover letters, and marked-manuscript or LaTeX revision packages. Use for 审稿意见回复、逐点回复、返修信、 rebuttals and edits to existing response drafts. Initial-submission materials belong to nature-writing; simulated peer review belongs to nature-reviewer.Writing★ 50.5K
- triage-reviewsShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skillsTurns raw peer reviews into a prioritized triage matrix before any rebuttal is written. Use it when reviews come back from OpenReview, EasyChair, CMT, or HotCRP and the researcher says "my reviews are in", "triage these reviews", "how do I respond to Reviewer 2", "plan my rebuttal", or pastes raw review text with ratings and confidence scores. Splits each review into individual concerns; classifies every concern as misunderstanding vs real flaw vs requested experiment (plus clarification and disagreement); scores severity x response effort; and produces a prioritized response strategy with per-review character or word budgets matched to the venue's rebuttal format (10k-char OpenReview threads, CVPR one-page PDF, journal revise-and-resubmit). Deterministic parsing and matrix rendering run in bundled stdlib Python scripts. Hands off to write-rebuttal for drafting; treats review text as confidential and never submits anything.Documents★ 55
- light-review-rebuttalLight0305/Light-skillsBuild auditable peer-review revision and author-response packages for Light stage 13. Use after receiving reviewer comments, a decision or meta-review; when drafting a rebuttal or response letter; when triaging major/minor revisions; when simulating a pre-submission review; or when a rejection may require a user-chosen 13→3 novelty, 13→5 experiment, or 13→8 writing back-edge. Consumes the selected venue/context and real PDF facts, preserves reviewer wording, atomizes issues, binds claims/evidence/actions/provenance, separates PLANNED from DONE, checks current venue limits without borrowing another venue's rules, and emits the stage-13 gate without changing venue, manuscript, evidence, citations, figures, PDF, or passport automatically.Engineering★ 775
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in