journal-recommender
From the author
Use when the user asks for journal recommendation, 选刊, 投稿期刊筛选, 期刊匹配, 适合投稿的期刊, 投哪个期刊, or wants 3-5 suitable journals for a manuscript based on an abstract, discipline, CAS/JCR ranking, impact factor, Aims & Scope, review speed, OA/APC, and publication-risk checks.
Install
npx skills add zero565656/journal-recommender --skill journal-recommender -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/journal-recommender/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
No download: this skill’s licence (No licence) does not let us redistribute its files. The install commands fetch them from GitHub instead.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 70
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- find-journalAperivue/medsci-skillsUse when choosing where to submit a manuscript. Matches the abstract against curated journal profiles and returns ranked picks with scope fit, AI-disclosure policy, an acceptance-readiness pre-flight and a reject-fallback cascade. Impact and APC figures may be stale.Other★ 350
- paper-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsEvaluate a paper's contribution novelty, identify best-fit SSCI journal fields and ABS star rating, and recommend 20 target journals. Trigger when user says "paper submission" / "paper-submission" / "投稿评估" / "期刊推荐" / "target journal" / "选刊".Science★ 4.8K
- journal-guidelinesbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUse when preparing a paper for submission to a specific journal, checking formatting requirements, parsing instructions for authors, building a submission checklist, or adapting a paper to a journal template. Fetches the journal's official guidelines via web and produces a verifiable checklist.Science★ 4.8K
- peer-reviewforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsStructured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.Engineering★ 3.8K
- journal-reviewscdenney/open-science-skillsDrafts a referee report for a journal editor. Produces a recommendation, claim-and-design summary, three to six decision-driving concerns, additional concerns, and a revision plan through five parallel adversarial finders, Breaker, Butcher, Shredder, Void, Situator, a Blue Team error filter, Chief Reviewer synthesis, Tone Guard legal pass, and optional confidential editor note. Use when the user has been asked to referee a manuscript. Self-audits go to paper-review-lite or presubmit, and author responses go to referee-response.Engineering★ 69
- literature-reviewbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills帮助用户撰写高质量的文献综述类论文。提供从选题、文献检索、评估筛选、结构规划到最终写作的全流程指导。适用于需要撰写独立文献综述论文或学术论文中文献综述部分的用户。Engineering★ 4.8K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in