deliverable-lint
From the author
Reviews a whole deliverable (talk, course module, paper, chapter, or referee report) against its manifest without rewriting it. Runs a deterministic gate for build, citations, numbers, facts, and leaks and stops on failure, then runs a finder over each section and a strong-model pass over the whole work, and adjudicates into checks/<date>/findings.json and report.md with anchored findings, severities, and honest NOT CHECKED coverage within a dollar budget. Use when asked to lint or review the whole talk, module, or paper, for a pre-ship review, or for the night shift. Revision stays serial and author-led.
Install
npx skills add scdenney/open-science-skills --skill deliverable-lint -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/deliverable-lint/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
No download: this skill’s licence (Custom or unclear) does not let us redistribute its files. The install commands fetch them from GitHub instead.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 77
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- lintMetamusicX/zissa-wikiAudit the research wiki — mechanical checks via scripts/wiki.py plus judgement checks for duplicates, contradictions, stale and weak pages. Reports a prioritised issue list; fixes nothing. Use when the researcher says "lint".Science★ 61
- deliverable-openscdenney/open-science-skillsOpens a talk, module, paper, chapter, or referee report as a multi-session deliverable. Interviews the author, then scaffolds deliverable.yml, HANDOFF.md, the planning/ wiki, inbox/, and checks/. Use for deadline-driven work spanning sessions.Science★ 69
- literature-reviewaipoch/open-scienceFind, verify, and synthesize scientific literature — from "what's the seminal paper for X" through full multi-source reviews. Covers grounding claims in real retrieved sources, avoiding fabricated citations, handling retractions, and calibrating confidence to evidence strength.Engineering★ 5.4K
- adjudicate-reviewpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowTurn an incoming set of findings — from an AI reviewer, a referee report, a code review, a linter, or a second model — into verified fixes, without letting a confident misread damage correct work. Every finding is a CANDIDATE until checked against the actual source. Use whenever you receive review comments, audit findings, or a critique you did not write yourself, especially when the reviewer is a model or when the volume is too large to check by feel.Engineering★ 1.7K
- lint-tasksUiPath/coder_evalReview existing coder-eval task YAML — find criteria that cannot fail, prompts that leak the answer, and near-duplicate tasks, each with a fix. Read-only. Use when the user wants existing tasks reviewed, linted, audited, or checked for gaps.Productivity★ 154
- paper-reviewbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUse when a paper is complete or near-complete and a holistic pre-submission audit is needed. Cross-cuts text, code, tables, figures, results, citations, and reproducibility in a single pass and produces a persistent audit report. Works standalone on papers written outside the plugin.Science★ 4.8K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in